On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 07:25:37PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 06:19:16PM +0000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-07 18:45]: > > > I think netjuke needs some serious love, or it should probably be removed > > > from the archive. > > > > > > Judging from the calibre of the bugs open against it, it is fairly > > > non-functional out of the box at present, and it's been orphaned for 2 > > > months, and seriously neglected for about 18 months prior to that, and has > > > one RC bug open at present. > > > > Jeroen, what do you think? > > I'd say let it linger in wnpp for a bit more, it isn't there very long, > and only a month ago became O: again -- someone showed interest in > keeping it for Debian (though he doesn't want to do it himself). > > Since it's not in testing, it only eats a little bit of diskspace on the > mirrors. > > IMHO, before removing a package, we should give potential adopters the > chance to see it and pick it up. >
It's lingered a bit longer... regards Andrew -- linux.conf.au 2005 - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - Birthplace of Tux April 18th to 23rd - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - LINUX Canberra, Australia - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - Get bitten!
