* Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-12 23:07]:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 12:10:04AM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Paul Hedderly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > atmelwlandriver, drsync, gloo, gtk-menu, matchbox, mmenu, motion, xkbd,
> > xstroke
>
> He states in #197943 he is a little busy
* Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-12 19:59]:
> W: libkemo-m104 source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.2
>
> Martin, what do you think?
The maintainer told me that he tried to contact the upstream
maintainer and was told this library is no loner supported. I filed a
request for
* Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-19 12:07]:
> A few days ago, I asked (debian-admin) for a couple of packages to be
> installed in the ia64 sarge chroot. No response so far. Is there
> another avenue?
They are usually pretty fast with this. Just wait a few more days, it
was the weeken
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 07:51:12PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-13 19:11]:
> > #189751: lanoche: depends on non-existent xviddetect
> >
> > I wonder if this is a good candidate to be dropped since removing
> > the dependency on xviddetect is more than
* Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-13 19:11]:
> #189751: lanoche: depends on non-existent xviddetect
>
> I wonder if this is a good candidate to be dropped since removing
> the dependency on xviddetect is more than a packaging issue.
The maintainer agrees. He says lshw is a good alternat
Am Son, 2003-10-12 um 16.43 schrieb Martin Michlmayr:
> Simon asked for help because of exams. None of his packages currently
> have RC bugs, but they could use some attention.
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I take uptimed
--
Daniel Gubser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-14 16:39]:
> > Stijn de Bekker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> Stijn seems to be fairly inactive. He has a number of bugs open for a
Yeah, I know. I contacted him recently and he said that some people
are interested in adopting his pacakges. I asked who.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 12:10:04AM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Stijn de Bekker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> RC bug with patch, also new upstream available.
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stijn seems to be fairly inactive. He has a number of bugs open for a
while, and addit
Hi!
(sorry for the wrong thread position, I don't have the original
message since I subscribed too late).
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Pawel Wiecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Pawel is around and did an upload of vpopmail after some prodding, but
> I think he could use some help.
#189751: lanoche: depends on non-existent xviddetect
Package: lanoche; Severity: serious; Reported by: Laurent Bonnaud
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 177 days old.
I've looked into this one a bit. The program displays an HTML report
of the hardware on a computer.
I wonder if this is a good candid
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 12:10:04AM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Stijn de Bekker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> RC bug with patch, also new upstream available.
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have made an NMU of this package that fixes the RC bug (#210558).
--
gram
signat
* tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-13 14:54]:
> Grzegorz Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> pimppa has 1 RC bug (please NMU), php4-interbase has 3 -- it has to
> be investigated whether this package shold be removed. Please do
> not touch sab
Grzegorz Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pimppa has 1 RC bug (please NMU), php4-interbase has 3 -- it has to
be investigated whether this package shold be removed. Please do
not touch sablevm.
14:25 < gadek> tbm: I am probably going to ORPHA
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 12:10:04AM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Paul Hedderly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> atmelwlandriver, drsync, gloo, gtk-menu, matchbox, mmenu, motion, xkbd,
> xstroke
He states in #197943 he is a little busy and will accept co-maints.
This bug is 116 days old but I think the
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Werner Heuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Werner mentioned to me that he is moving. He has 2 RC bugs which
> have to be fixed.
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I had a look at #190685, it is pretty obvious to fix (obsolete GCC
swi
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Brian Mays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Brian said he's busy, but he's around. Perhaps don't NMU, but reproduce
> his bugs and send in patches. Give special attention to pcmcia-cs.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thomas Hood (and me, kinda) are c
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> fox, gimp-python, gmt, gmt-coast-low, gmt-doc, gmt-doc-pdf, gmt-doc-ps,
> gmt-examples, gmt-manpages, gmt-tutorial, gnofin, gs, gs-common, gsfonts,
> hpijs, libpcap, npadmin, swig, swig-doc, swig1.3, tcpd
Thanks for those who responded. I'm surprised (and delighted) how
many people got back to me. I hope you will really help out. I tried
to compile a listing of people of whom I think they are busy and need
help. Only a small number of developers have asked me to be put on
this list; the others a
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 01:45:05AM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> There are some developers who are clearly too busy to maintain their
> packages properly, but yet cannot be considered inactive enough so
> that their packages should be given away. I'd like to have a group of
> people who are wil
Hi, Martin Pitt wrote:
> But since IANADD (yet) I would need a sponsor for every upload; in the
> last weeks I've sent quite a bunch of bug followups which were only
> scarcely answered, thus half-MIA maintainers might not be the best
> sponsor candidates...
I'm available for sponsoring patch upl
* Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-08 18:43]:
> >From next Tuesday onward, I have lots of time and I would be
> interested in comaintenance of packages (especially RC bug fixing)
> until the Sarge release.
Sounds good, I've put you on my list. I will send out more
information later.
> Bu
Martin Pitt, 2003-10-08 19:20:18 +0200 :
> But since IANADD (yet) I would need a sponsor for every upload; in
> the last weeks I've sent quite a bunch of bug followups which were
> only scarcely answered, thus half-MIA maintainers might not be the
> best sponsor candidates...
>
> Can I still be of
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 10:08:07 -0700
Ben Gertzfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alioth has been a terrific resource for me in this regard. Using it and
> dpatch, I'm easily able to co-maintain packages, maintain bugs, and keep
> releases in check with multiple developers.
>
> I'd highly recomme
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
There are some developers who are clearly too busy to maintain their
packages properly, but yet cannot be considered inactive enough so
that their packages should be given away. I'd like to have a group of
people who are willing to help those developers out by co-maintai
Hi!
Am 2003-10-09 1:45 +1000 schrieb Martin Michlmayr:
> There are some developers who are clearly too busy to maintain their
> packages properly, but yet cannot be considered inactive enough so
> that their packages should be given away. I'd like to have a group of
> people who are willing to h
There are some developers who are clearly too busy to maintain their
packages properly, but yet cannot be considered inactive enough so
that their packages should be given away. I'd like to have a group of
people who are willing to help those developers out by co-maintaining
their packages for a w
26 matches
Mail list logo
