Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Werner Heuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Werner mentioned to me that he is moving. He has 2 RC bugs which > have to be fixed. > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED] I had a look at #190685, it is pretty obvious to fix (obsolete GCC switch). I have prepared a NMU but I can't test it because the package is a library for some obscure hardware I never heard of, so I won't upload it. I'll send a patch to the bug. I'm wondering whether it would not be easier to drop this package entirely, given that: - it has two FTBFS bugs opened (one severity important, the other serious) which were never responded to even though one of them is dated July 10, 2002. - the package has had only one upload overall and is in pretty bad shape, I get the following lintian warnings and errors: W: libkemo-m104 source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.2 E: libkemo-m1041: sharedobject-in-library-directory-not-actually-a-shlib usr/lib/libkemo-m104.so.1 W: libkemo-m1041: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-with-dh_make-boilerplate W: libkemo-m104-dev: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-with-dh_make-boilerplate ... and the versioning scheme looks fishy (version 1-1?). - the library doesn't seem to be used by any program in the distribution: $ apt-cache rdepends libkemo-m1041 libkemo-m1041 Reverse Depends: libkemo-m104-dev $ apt-cache rdepends libkemo-m104-dev libkemo-m104-dev Reverse Depends: $ Martin, what do you think? -- ,''`. : :' : Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> `. `' http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/ `-
