Le 2000-03-14 17:57:30 +0100, Michael Meskes écrivait :
> This bug is listed as important bug against metamail. I do wonder though if
> it is important enough to warrant a removal. This bug has been reported
> against mime-support originally. Since no bug in mime-support was found it
> was re-assig
I wasn't able to reproduce this bug. Both the slink and potato
versions of mime-support and metamail worked fine:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/t$ metamail -b -c image/x-portable-pixmap bg-greenhill.xpm
This message contains 'image/x-portable-pixmap'-format data.
Do you want to view it using the 'display'
> > Since /etc/mailcap was not included, there is no way I can determine
> > what the problem may be. I'd guess that metamail is the source of
> > the problem, or possibly the mailcap line created by the zgv file.
> >
>
> Please find attached my mailcap file.
>
> I have also tested the following
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 58174 metamail
Bug#58174: metamail is unable to launch any file
Bug reassigned from package `mime-support' to `metamail'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administra
reassign 58174 metamail
--
> Package: mime-support
> Version: 3.9-1
> Severity: important
Since /etc/mailcap was not included, there is no way I can determine
what the problem may be. I'd guess that metamail is the source of
the problem, or possibly the mailcap line created by the zgv file.
>
Le 2000-02-15 23:15:19 -0500, Brian White écrivait :
> reassign 58174 metamail
> --
>
> > Package: mime-support
> > Version: 3.9-1
> > Severity: important
>
> Since /etc/mailcap was not included, there is no way I can determine
> what the problem may be. I'd guess that metamail is the source of
6 matches
Mail list logo
