Bug#108567: xinetd

2001-08-31 Thread Daniel Silverstone
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:50:08AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > > I believe it to have been fixed in an easrlier version of xinetd, such that > > the current unstable/testing version 1:2.3.0-1 should not have the issue > > you described (I couldn't reproduce it). > it should have been fixed in the

Bug#108567: xinetd

2001-08-31 Thread Ethan Benson
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 02:46:08PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote: > Hello, > > I am intending on uploading a new version of xinetd tonight as I have > adopted the package. > > I would like to close bug 108567 since it is grave and therefore could hold up > the freeze. > > I believe it to have

Bug#108567: xinetd

2001-08-31 Thread Daniel Silverstone
Hello, I am intending on uploading a new version of xinetd tonight as I have adopted the package. I would like to close bug 108567 since it is grave and therefore could hold up the freeze. I believe it to have been fixed in an easrlier version of xinetd, such that the current unstable/testing ve

Bug#108567: xinetd umask issues

2001-08-30 Thread Daniel Silverstone
Hello, I believe that the umask issue was corrected in xinetd 2.1.8.9pre16. Particular changelog entry which catches my eye: Changed umask to OR 022 with current umask - Solar Designer ^^ Does that sound right to you? Daniel -- Daniel Silverstone