Hello.
The text of Spanish pages like,
https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-desktop/index.es.html ,
are written in ISO8859-1, but the html header declares it is utf-8 text.
The result is that instead of Spanish characters, a question mark is
displayed. What I do if to force browser to ignore
Hi Paul,
Thank you for the update.
Let me check and I will update you the status.
Regards,
Rahulkrishnan R A
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Rahulkrishnan R A wrote:
>
> > I have send ITA for the bug #753565. I am unable to ac
Hi Team,
I have send ITA for the bug #753565. I am unable to access the git repo if
the package to update. Please help me to sort this issue.
https://packages.qa.debian.org/a/ajaxterm.html
--
Regards,
Rahulkrishnan R A
their umbrella
and will help you with the task.
...
That also sounds as a good solution to avoid NEW queue. I am almost
certain there will be people interested in pkg-multimedia to take care
of MH. I understand upstream's concerns about the ancient version
currently available in Debian. If
2015-04-01 22:29 GMT+01:00 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
:
> 2015-04-01 22:00 GMT+01:00 Joel Palmius :
>>> I can volunteer to upload a new version within a few days/weeks, if
>>> everybody is
>>> happy with that, if the changes needed from the packaging side are not
2015-04-01 22:00 GMT+01:00 Joel Palmius :
>> I can volunteer to upload a new version within a few days/weeks, if
>> everybody is
>> happy with that, if the changes needed from the packaging side are not
>> too many
>> and specially if there are no nasty/boring lice
2015-04-01 14:23 Joel Palmius:
This is a perfectly acceptable solution. The main thing we wanted to
achieve here was to get the four year old alpha 6 out of circulation,
and that is the goal that has priority over other concerns. So yes, we
would like to have the package removed from Unstable
n hovering the mouse over the characters in
"✔✔✔✘", it tells about amd64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386... so also missing
"arm64" and "ppc64el".
Cheers.
--
Manuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
(Please CC me if you want me to receive the reply).
Hi,
I am looking at NMUing one of Zak's packages (libmemcache, which
perhaps should be removed instead of NMUed), and I noticed that he
seems inactive since a long time ago, few uploads after 2010.
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?
package is in NEW.
It takes a manual check in NEW to actually see if work needs to be
done. If there is some indicator showing package in NEW is fixing this
would be awesome. We can match binary packages to find this out.
--
പ്രവീണ് അരിമ്പ്രത്തൊടിയില്
You have to keep reminding your government
Hello,
(I'm not subscribed to QA --perhaps I should for coordinating this?--,
so if you expect replies of me make sure that I'm in CC. Also, I'm on
holidays so my replies can have quite a bit of delay depending on the
day...).
>> An additional problem with having multiple
Hello QA-team,
I believe that the graphs have not been updated in a few weeks.
Installations of "aqsis" (the binary) surpassed 260 a while ago, but
it's not reflected in the graphs (the upper limit is 250):
http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=aqsis
Could you please look into
> even though Neil Williams tried to give him a hand.
He did? I'd be happy to have a co-maintainer.
In any case, I'm in contact w/ upstream, and updating the package to
upstream version 2.x.
--Barak.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
reopen 452905 !
reassign 452905 bugs.debian.org
thanks
Is this right pseudo-package for this bug?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As per the closing 'bot message:
You should be hearing from them with a substantive response shortly,
in case you haven't already. If not, please contact them directly.
But no "substantive response" in two closings. Perhaps the above
disappointing boilerplat
reopen 452905 !
thanks
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 22:27:13 +
Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Namely, that BTS pages for bogus names can be accessed:
> >
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=Microsoft%20Windows%20Vista;dist=unstab
ns, and all architectures.
Sorry, your search gave no results
Note: in the BTS thread for bug #441283, C. Berg says that one goal is
to preserve any useful info, (presumably for packages that formerly
exist); possible fix:
Make a big list of every Debian package that ever existed.
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Googling for my email address revealed:
Debian Developer's Packages Overview
Packages overview for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...the page says I'm a Debian Developer, which isn't so. (I re
Hi!
I was taking a look at the package "elmo" and I saw that it was last
uploaded by Jacek on 2004.
There are 7 bugs opened against elmo (some are easy to fix) and the
last upload was a NMU by Bastian Venthur. There is also a new upstream
release (version 1.3.2), but it's not repo
Hi!
(I am CCing Alexander)
On 3/28/06, Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the light of Alexander Schmehl's message in this thread on
> debian-qa in March 2005 you may want to adopt pngcrush as a first step.
Is the ITA (#353392) not active?
Alexander sa
Hi!
On 3/25/06, Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 18:20 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> > I still don't see good reasons to merge the 4 programs :-/
>
> It's of course always a tradeoff between the extra work of merging
> t
Hi!
On 3/24/06, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
>
> > The 4 programs are similar, but different. They are small too.
>
> If there is no chance to unify these algorithms in one single
> program using differen
Hi!
On 3/23/06, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
>
> > I have no strong feelings about pngcrush. Just used it a couple of
> > times in the past and might need such a tool in the future, while not
> > knowing o
Hi,
Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mon Jan 16 17:43:39 2006):
> Hello *,
>
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 12:29:37PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>> Is Stephan A Suerken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIA?
>
> FWIW, given that I'm pretty interested in reviving uae mai
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
I was taking a look at my packages on qa.debian.org and I saw that on
the field "Watch Unstable", of the package qsf, there was an "Error Details".
However, that watch file is valid!
$ uscan --verbose
-- Scanning for watc
streamline the process a bit more and to make it
a bit easier for more people to get involved.
These things take time. As it stands now, we have a hard time
processing applicants in our NM queue. And these are people who
have made significant contributions and commitments to Debian. Next
tim
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor
Hi
I was taking a look at the PTS of biofox (a package that I maintain).
http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/biofox.html
It's missing a news about revision 1.1-2, that is on unstable and on
testing. (On the changelog
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs
d
> > suggest
> > to add Nelson to the uploaders field. Thus the package is not really
> > stolen but we can find a reasonable way to update the package for the
> > time Matthew might have time constraints. I would volunteer to sponsor
> > the package for Nelson
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor
Hi!
The initial page of http://qa.debian.org/ says:
Both developers and users can help to make Debian a better system. The
Debian Project is currently working on a release of the next version,
codenamed sarge.
I think that this "sarge" on
chine. After
that, ndiswrapper-modules I built will install fine (dependencies met)
Try to remove kernel-image-2.6.8-386, and I lose ndis-utils, yada
yada...
maybe y'all could talk to each other?
It's a pain to carry around a kernel I don't need or want just to run a
silly
Download anything you want from our site!
http://asbestiform.begitodreamof.com/?a=409
Do you practice driving in London?
A cynic is a man who knows the price of everything, and the value of nothing. Oscar Wilde
purple peach yellow peach
Haven't the photographers already disliked praying?
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 06:14:40PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 01:10:30PM +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote:
>
> > There's a few reasonably annoying bugs in dhcp3-client, that have
> > been open for a fair while and have patches.
> >
> >
living on this unknown little island
had also quickened their pace rode down a hill and passing through Presently the ravine grew narrower for a space and carelessly disposed of all the armies the men around him were his assistants
reverberating filling the whole empty ballroom and slowly dying from his
Learn how to Make a Fortune on Google!
A little extra is always helpful, especially around the holidays!
Here is our receipe for success...
http://lc.valuesstat.com/newlc/go/2214
Use this link to change your recipient status.
http://lc.valuesstat.com/unsub/central/[EMAIL PROTECTED
Get a Date TONIGHT!
Free personal profile.
Over 4 million singles to search through and find a match.
Don't wait to get your love life started!
http://lc.choiceandvalue.com/newlc/go/2101
To have your address eliminated from our mailing list,
follow this link:
See www.apocketfullofeuros.com for an
unofficial guide to EU R&D framework
funding
How can I install xmap on sid?
zakend
--
Tego nie znajdziesz w żadnym sklepie!
[ http://oferty.onet.pl ]
hi
I have read in weekly news that some very nice packages, as e.g.
Mutt, CVS, Procmail, Apache and Mozilla
may not go into the freeze
I have give a look at Mutt's bugs;
some bugs are very old; we may at least help in seeing if they are still
reproducible, and tag them if they are n
A new release of PCCTS has been made. It maintenance release 27 and it
can be found at www.polhode.com. The current release (MR25) in
debian unstable is broken. Would you please update the debian package
to this newer release? Thanks.
regards,
p. wilsey
--
Philip A. Wilsey 513
Package: osh
Version: 1.7-7
Severity: important
I have replaced sys_errlist with strerror wihich is more portable.
It also allows osh to compile and run on GNU HURD.
James Morrison
--- handlers.old.c Sun Jul 29 13:25:18 2001
+++ handlers.c Sun Jul 29 13:26:19 2001
@@ -569,10 +569
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 02:37:34AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could you please add the QA cvs repository to
> klecker:/org/cvs.debian.org/cvswrappers:
>
Added.
--
James (Jay) Treacy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi
I have found your e-mails (and the email of the debian-qa group)
inside the latest packaging of "xmorph"
I am coauthor of "xmorph"
I am a mantainer, and I think I may adopt "xmorph" and package it
I have already sent an e-mail to Arocha, that
was consideri
After apt-get dist-upgrade and upgrading lockvc to 3.9-1, I am not able to
run lockvc under X.
Not running in graphics-capable virtual console.
It's OK, but it worked with 3.4-2.
Was just wondering...
-- System Information
Debian Release: woody
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux erde 2.2.15 #11 SMP
Package: xwpe
Version: 1.4.2-2.1
i use xwpe to open /debian/main/binary-i386/Packages on my Debian 2.0 CD
and locate the following line:
Package: dotfile-doc
xwpe shows that it's on 4876th line. However edit.com of Win95 says it is
on 4875th line. i know M$ is right because i write an editor for
Package: xwpe
Version: 1.4.2-2.1
i use xwpe to open /debian/main/binary-i386/Packages on my Debian 2.0 CD
and locate the following line:
Package: dotfile-doc
xwpe shows that it's on 4876th line. However edit.com of Win95 says it is
on 4875th line. i know M$ is right because i write an editor for
i use xwpe to open /debian/main/binary-i386/Packages on my Debian 2.0 CD
and locate the following line:
Package: dotfile-doc
xwpe shows that it's on 4876th line. However edit.com of Win95 says it is
on 4875th line. i know M$ is right because i write an editor for Linux and
it agree with M$.
xwpe
i use xwpe to open /debian/main/binary-i386/Packages on my Debian 2.0 CD
and locate the following line:
Package: dotfile-doc
xwpe shows that it's on 4876th line. However edit.com of Win95 says it is
on 4875th line. i know M$ is right because i write an editor for Linux and
it agree with M$.
xwpe
Anthony> I'm experimenting with a script to work out whether packages are
Anthony> installable or not. I figured the world at large might be
interested in
Anthony> some of the results.
Anthony> The following packages are not installable (ie, their Depen
I noticed that our most recent mozilla build is circa Oct 1998.
I plan on attempting to build this beast, and was wondering if anyone
objects if I do a Non-Maintainer Upload if I manage to build it?
Thanks,
-Brent
Has any progress been made on tracking down the cause of this bug.
It seems a number of people are being affected by it.
Jay Treacy
> I've removed the following packages from Hamm because they still have
> critical, grave, or important bugs registered against them. To get them
> back in the archive, simply upload a version to "frozen" that fixes _all_
> of the open critical, grave, and important b
51 matches
Mail list logo
