Re: duck.debian.net down

mail every 30 minutes...). Cheers, On Tue, 21 Jan 2020, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Hi, On Sun, 19 Jan 2020, Simon Kainz wrote: thanks for the ping - it seems we have some uplink issues at work. Will report back on monday. What's up? I still get failures from distro-tracke

Re: duck.debian.net down

thanks for the ping - it seems we have some uplink issues at work. Will report back on monday. Thanks & bye, Simon Am 19.01.20 um 02:53 schrieb Paul Wise: > Hi Simon, > > I see duck.debian.net is down, the web server gives connection refused. > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital si

Bug#906954: tracker.debian.org: incorrect DUCK last update time

hi, well i got a complaint from the salsa team because DUCK generated too much load there. I the reduced the scan rate for e.g. the repos, seems like i messed something up and the jobs got stuck. will fix this tomorrow. sorry, Am 2018-08-22 um 19:20 schrieb Raphael Hertzog: > Hi, > > On Wed, 22

http:// vs. https:// in machine readable copyright file

Hello - minor issue for sure, but still : Following [0], i should put Format: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ in my machine readable copyright file. Currently duck reports that the url specified is also available via https (which is true), so should i inform ab

Re: Access to packages in the NEW queue

Am 2016-07-05 um 11:08 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo: > On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:47:35AM +0200, Simon Kainz wrote: >> Currently i can only get some information (html dump of varois files ) >> via the links on [0], but i think we should be able to get the real >> packages. &g

Access to packages in the NEW queue

Hello, I would like to ask for options/help concerning access to packages in the new queue: As we are running already lots of automatic testing tools on various machines, i was thinking about running e.g. check-all-the-things on packages in the NEW queue, so *before* they enter the archive? I thi

GoogleCode, gitorious and codehaus.org end of life, expected URL breakage ahead!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello, as was already announced here [1], and also discussed here [2], GoogleCode, gitorious.org and codehaus.org are in the process of shutting down their services, or have already. To prevent bitrod/broken links, please take a look at [3], listi

Re: darcs.debian.org broken?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am 2015-07-19 um 09:48 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > Hi, > > Am Samstag, den 18.07.2015, 22:08 +0200 schrieb Alexander Wirt: >> On Sat, 18 Jul 2015, James McCoy wrote: >>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 08:24:51PM +0200, Simon K

darcs.debian.org broken?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello, DUCK [1] just informed me, that there are ~750 issues with VCS-Darcs URLS [2], mosty 404. This seems to be the fact since now 3 days. Please take care of that. Regards, Simon [1] http://duck.debian.net [2] http://duck.debian.net/domains/d

https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ outdated

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello, i just noticed that https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ seems to be last updated at Sat, Dec 20, according to the timestamp in the footer. " Last Modified: Sat, Dec 20 11:36:05 UTC 2014 " Also, how-can-i-help --old shows more/different pack

Bug#764199: UDD: XSS in bts-usertags-cgi

/library/cgi.html >From 7af4b228a3d352d4e14537ffa33cd1c3173fe505 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Kainz Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:06:14 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] add escaping for < and > charachters in bug title --- web/cgi-bin/bts-usertags.cgi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

Bug#773828: UDD: bts-usertags.cgi: inside

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 tags 773828 patch thanks Please see the attached patch. Bye, Simon -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIbBAEBCgAGBQJUvhz4AAoJEBy08PeN7K/pOuwP9imZGSSz0AuEKkizkWa0ttfC ymggBENxqVaxFLXVKMTT2T4yRtgVqeRdjU9hc5pgKj/LI8KNX6twfqZK8fryiuHb LH

Re: Differences between fields in debian/control and upstream-metadata

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am 2014-09-08 12:26, schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Charles, > > On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 07:18:33PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: >> >> On https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata I moved the Homepage >> and Watch fields to a new section, « Fields that

Re: Differences between fields in debian/control and upstream-metadata

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am 2014-09-03 05:11, schrieb David Prévot: > Hi, > > Le 02/09/2014 17:04, Simon Kainz a écrit : >> mira upstream-metadata: >> http://www.chevreux.org/projects_mira.html control-file: >> http://chevreux.org/projects_mi

Differences between fields in debian/control and upstream-metadata

Hello, i found some (well, 27) packages where the Homepage: entry in the control file is different than the Homepage: entry in the upstream-metadata file. (Althouh 27 is now much right now, i actually expect this number to increase, as there surely will be more upstream-metadata per package in the

Re: Request for acess to UDD

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am 2014-08-25 15:12, schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > Hi, > > On 25/08/14 at 13:02 +0200, Simon Kainz wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 >> >> Am 2014-08-20 14:25, schrieb Simon Kainz: >>> Am

Re: Request for acess to UDD

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am 2014-08-20 14:25, schrieb Simon Kainz: > Am 2014-08-18 14:18, schrieb Christophe Siraut: >> Hi, > >> Simon Kainz wrote: >>> ok, i found it inside UDD, table public.carnivore_emails. >>> >>> Now a

Bug#758502: tracker.debian.org: Add data from duck.debian.net to "action needed" panel

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am 2014-08-19 11:13, schrieb Raphael Hertzog: > Hello Simon, > > On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Simon Kainz wrote: >> this adds support for data from duck.debian.net. > > Thanks for the patch! Here are a few things to fix: > > Fi

Request for acess to UDD (was: Re: DDPO: multiple email accounts for same person)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am 2014-08-18 14:18, schrieb Christophe Siraut: > Hi, > > Simon Kainz wrote: >> ok, i found it inside UDD, table public.carnivore_emails. >> >> Now a new question arises: How may i get this data from udd on a >>

Bug#758502: tracker.debian.org: Add data from duck.debian.net to "action needed" panel

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am 2014-08-19 11:26, schrieb Raphael Hertzog: > Control: forcemerge -1 756745 > > On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Simon Kainz wrote: >> this adds support for data from duck.debian.net. > > There was already an open bug against track

Bug#758502: tracker.debian.org: Add data from duck.debian.net to "action needed" panel

ux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_AT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_AT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash >From a0a3810608a306ab77eee214a9be0854e39e3367 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Kainz Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:42:28 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] add new temp

Re: DDPO: multiple email accounts for same person

try things out, but is there another way to make it avail from duck.debian.net? Probably via a cgi-script like http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/ ? Bye, Simon Am 2014-08-13 07:21, schrieb Simon Kainz: > Hello, > > on DDPO, visiting [0], there a 2 email adresses listed for e.g. > An

DDPO: multiple email accounts for same person

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello, on DDPO, visiting [0], there a 2 email adresses listed for e.g. Andrew Shadura. In the repo [1] is see some magic happening with a carnivore.db database file. My question is: Is this the way/dtaabase i can use to find multiple email address

Q concerning canonical urls

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, [1] mentions, anonymous svn urls (eg in d/control) should look like this: svn://anonscm.debian.org/$project/ so for zenity, this shoul be: svn://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-gnome/desktop/unstable/zenity which gives me svn: No repository found in

Re: Packages with non-existing maintainer/uploader emails addresses

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am 2014-03-10 10:53, schrieb Ricardo Mones: > Hi Simon, > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:17:59AM +0100, Simon Kainz wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> Please see attached 2 files with a list of email addresses & >

Packages with non-existing maintainer/uploader emails addresses

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Please see attached 2 files with a list of email addresses & source packages names, where the email adresses are invalid. As it's not possible (at least to my understanding) to send email to domains without MX records _and_ without A/ reco

Re: Bug#740862: Fwd: Bug#740862: duck: Should cease to pass "mailto:" URLs to curl

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am 2014-03-07 09:54, schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Simon, > > On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 09:09:02AM +0100, Simon Kainz wrote: >>> >>>> My *personal* opinion is that I would be fine with either of >>>> these

Re: Fwd: Bug#740862: duck: Should cease to pass "mailto:" URLs to curl

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am 2014-03-06 11:55, schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Simon, > > I think the proper place to discuss this is debian-qa list (please > correct me if I'm wrong. > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:30:32AM +0100, Simon Kainz wrote: &

debian/control files: Identical maintainer and uploaders

Hi! After grepping around in Sources.gz on my favorite mirror, I found the following: Package:colo Maintainer: Martin Michlmayr Uploaders: Martin Michlmayr , Peter 'p2' De Schrijver Package:extra-xdg-menus Maintainer: Peter Clifton Uploaders: Peter Clifton , Hamish Moffatt

Re: Multi-bug filing question

Am 2014-01-04 23:22, schrieb Niels Thykier: On 2014-01-04 23:16, gregor herrmann wrote: On Sat, 04 Jan 2014 22:36:20 +0100, Simon Kainz wrote: Dropping the "+ssh" part leads to working urls. So my question is: Is there some way (or recommendation) to easily file this bug against ~2

Multi-bug filing question

Hi! After digging around in the Source.gz file (ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/source/Sources.gz) i found 20 Vcs-* entries with the following issue: E.g. package entagged: The Vcs-Svn field looks like this: Vcs-Svn: svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/entagged Whi

Missing man pages: avr-libc/avr-man

Hello! Trying to write some missing manpages, I found the following http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html lists avr-man (from package avr-libc) currently without a manpage. After inspecting avr-man ( http://sources.debian.net/src/avr-libc/1:1.8.0-4/scripts/avr-man.in ) i see that this is esse

Re: Huge list of broken Vcs-Svn entries in control files

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 08/28/13 10:31, schrieb Alexander Wirt: > Andreas Tille schrieb am Wednesday, den 28. August 2013: > >> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 07:55:44AM -0400, James McCoy wrote: _BUT_: After changing svn://svn.debian.org/... to svn://anonscm.debian.o

Re: Huge list of broken Vcs-Svn entries in control files

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 08/26/13 15:17, schrieb Andrey Rahmatullin: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 07:55:44AM -0400, James McCoy wrote: >> See also >> , so >> maintainers should be aware of the problem. > It's only I:

Huge list of broken Vcs-Svn entries in control files

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! (Sorry, this might be a bit longer to read, but I really want to make my points clear...) Currently (as of 2012-08-26) duck.debian.net shows me 9301 binary packages with URL issues, resulting from 4318 source packages. I took a closer look and n

Re: Q: Concerning package adoption

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 08/21/13 11:17, schrieb Ricardo Mones: > Hi Simon, > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:43:40AM +0200, Simon Kainz wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I would like to adopt the orphaned package snowdrop. Reading >> >> http:

Q: Concerning package adoption

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I would like to adopt the orphaned package snowdrop. Reading http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=557585 it tells me to look at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o . But I am no maintainer, so i surely can't just pu

Re: Question concerning watch file checks in PTS

Am 2013-01-28 21:55, schrieb Bart Martens: On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:40:22PM +0100, Simon Kainz wrote: Trying to fix some watch files, i got a bit confused: Looking at http://qa.debian.org/watch/uscan-errors.txt (dated 2012-01-28, as i can see here: http://qa.debian.org/watch/ ), i see e.g the

Question concerning watch file checks in PTS

Hi! Trying to fix some watch files, i got a bit confused: Looking at http://qa.debian.org/watch/uscan-errors.txt (dated 2012-01-28, as i can see here: http://qa.debian.org/watch/ ), i see e.g the following line: apgdiff 2.4-1 : failed: 500 .*Bad hostname So i do an apt-get source to get

Re: DUCK Status update, RFC

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 01/02/13 17:38, schrieb Paul Wise: > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Simon Kainz wrote: > >> I added the checks for SVN repos, which now leads to ~2700 >> binary packages with issues. > > Cool. > >> To link to

Re: DUCK Status update, RFC

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 01/02/13 16:12, schrieb Paul Tagliamonte: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 03:49:43PM +0100, Simon Kainz wrote: >> > Hi Pabs, hi qa team. > > Current development instance is here: (showing data from partials runs, > so expect str

DUCK Status update, RFC

me, to _really_ check out git repos. And yes, i know i still have to work in the design. This is still work in development, so please be kind ;-) and please give me feedback. Simon Am 12/30/12 08:29, schrieb Paul Wise: > On Sun, 2012-12-30 at 07:41 +0100, Simon Kainz wrote: > >> jus

Question concerning Package Description translation files

I am currently skimming through the translated Package descriptions stored in e.g. Translation-en (taken form http://ftp.tugraz.at/mirror/debian/dists/sid/main/i18n/Translation-en.bz2) and noticed the following: There seem to be some multiple entries for some packages e.g. $ cat Translation-en |

AW: Re: DUCK - the Debian Url Checker

Hi. Source will be avail on next tuesday, as i am currently "off the grid", together with the license. I will GPL it, so much for that.  Regards, Simon Von Samsung Mobile gesendet Paul Tagliamonte hat geschrieben: On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Simon Kainz wrote: > On 0

Re: DUCK - the Debian Url Checker

On 06/07/12 07:12, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Simon Kainz wrote: > >> Yes, certainly. I took a look at http://wiki.debian.org/DebianDotNet, but as >> I am not in the Debian keyring, who is there to ask for? > > Any Debian member can add a domain,

Re: DUCK - the Debian Url Checker

Zitat von Paul Wise : On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Simon Kainz wrote: Yes, certainly. I took a look at http://wiki.debian.org/DebianDotNet, but as I am not in the Debian keyring, who is there to ask for? Any Debian member can add a domain, including myself. Which domain would you like me

Re: DUCK - the Debian Url Checker

Zitat von Arno Töll : Hi, On 06.06.2012 15:18, Simon Kainz wrote: Please tell me what you think about it - I have already some more features planned. looks good and useful. Thanks for looking at this! This list isn't complete, is it? I'm quite surprised how many links are bro

Re: DUCK - the Debian Url Checker

Zitat von Paul Wise : On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Simon Kainz wrote: as I had some problems in the past finding upstream sources and homepages, I hacked up some scripts to monitor and display the results of the Upstream Homepage entries in the package control files. Please take a look at

DUCK - the Debian Url Checker

Hi list, as I had some problems in the past finding upstream sources and homepages, I hacked up some scripts to monitor and display the results of the Upstream Homepage entries in the package control files. Please take a look at http://debian.tugraz.at/duck/ Currently the job runs once a day and

Re: Checks for urls in packages - extend lintian

On 05/19/12 02:39, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Fri, May 18, 2012 at 02:15:48PM +0200, Simon Kainz a écrit : >> >> I think it would be better to extend lintian to check for broken urls >> (Homepage, VCS-Browser, Vcs-*). >> >> Is it okay if lintian needs network/int

Re: Checks for urls in packages - extend lintian

On 05/18/12 23:27, Russ Allbery wrote: > Simon Kainz writes: > >> After thinking about some time how to find/fix broken links in >> package descriptions, i came up with the following idea: > >> I think it would be better to extend lintian to check for broken >>

Checks for urls in packages - extend lintian

Hi, After thinking about some time how to find/fix broken links in package descriptions, i came up with the following idea: I think it would be better to extend lintian to check for broken urls (Homepage, VCS-Browser, Vcs-*). Is it okay if lintian needs network/internet access ( a patch is alrea

Re: (semi) automatic check for broken links in package descriptions

hosted on alioth.debian.org. Does anybody know who can I contact and discuss this issue? Regards, [1] http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/FAQ#Subversion.2BAC8-arch.2BAC8-bzr.2BAC8-git.2BAC8-hg.2BAC8-darcs.2BAC8-CVS_repositories Regards, Simon On 04/27/12 14:17, Simon Kainz wrote: > On 04/26/12 18:13, Russ

Re: (semi) automatic check for broken links in package descriptions

On 04/26/12 18:13, Russ Allbery wrote: > Tiago Bortoletto Vaz writes: > >> I'm with pabs about integrating it to qa.d.o, sounds really helpful :) >> Btw, I've just checked a few links reported as error 500 and some seem >> to not present any problem. See: > >> http://sdl.perl.org/ >> http://www.

Re: (semi) automatic check for broken links in package descriptions

On 04/26/12 12:28, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Simon Kainz wrote: > >> Well, currently i only check the "Homepage" fields. I thought about the >> other links as well, but processing the Homepage entries seemed to me a >> first reasonable

Re: (semi) automatic check for broken links in package descriptions

On 04/26/12 03:26, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Simon Kainz wrote: > >> after getting frustrated by broken links in some package descriptions, i >> hacked up a script to check for broken links in the packages descriptions. >> >> (see http:/

Re: (semi) automatic check for broken links in package descriptions

On 04/26/12 03:26, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Simon Kainz wrote: > >> after getting frustrated by broken links in some package descriptions, i >> hacked up a script to check for broken links in the packages descriptions. >> >> (see http:/

(semi) automatic check for broken links in package descriptions

Hi, after getting frustrated by broken links in some package descriptions, i hacked up a script to check for broken links in the packages descriptions. (see http://simon.familiekainz.at/dropbox/errs.html, based on wheezy/amd64) for an example. Is this worth investing some work into it?

Upper/lowercase issues in package descriptions

Hello, this is my first posting to QA, so here I go: Trying to work on WNPP packages and looking through several package descriptions, i noticed that several feature intermixed upper- and lowercase version of the package/tool name. For example lsof: skainz@myhost:~$ apt-cache show lsof Package