Re: License bugs for sarge

2004-01-27 Thread Raphael Goulais
Le mar 27/01/2004 à 04:49, Nathanael Nerode a écrit : > 228085: airstrike > -- unhelpful upstream, will probably need to be removed from sid I don't know about unhelpful upstream, but I'm the one who filled the five bug reports on airstrike, this one included. Five newer upstream releases are ava

Re: Future of rocks-n-diamonds

2004-01-26 Thread Raphael Goulais
Le lun 26/01/2004 à 10:15, John Lightsey a écrit : > It's not distributable. Much of the content is like an xmame rom, the > upstream author doesn't have a license to use it, but he's not worried > because there haven't been any complaints. Agreed. Upstream told me this was not an issue, since

Re: Future of rocks-n-diamonds

2004-01-25 Thread Raphael Goulais
Le dim 25/01/2004 à 21:07, John Lightsey a écrit : > The package is already orphaned and there have been at least three attempts > at > adopting it. I'm one of these three :) I would add something about the images. Some of them are from the original game, and upstream authors does consider them

Re: removal of airstrike package from testing ?

2004-01-19 Thread Raphael Goulais
severity 228085 serious retitle 228085 this release of airstrike is not GPL, nor DFSG compliant thanks The bug report states that *this* release is not GPL. The fact that airstrike's faq on their website states the game is GPL is not sufficient. We don't know to which version the GPL applies. To

Re: removal of airstrike package from testing ?

2004-01-16 Thread Raphael Goulais
Quoting Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It works fine for me (finnish keyboard) and the keyboard setup seems > to document playing the game rather well. It's no nethack.. Does the finish keyboard have numbers with or without shift pressed ? French keyboards needs to press shift for numbers. The

removal of airstrike package from testing ?

2004-01-16 Thread Raphael Goulais
Hi all, The airstrike package has been packaged by Sven Velt, and sponsored by Norbert Tretkowski, so I put them on CC:. I submited several bug reports on the airstrike package, see http://bugs.debian.org/airstrike (my two last bug reports are not on the bts, just sent them, the three others are

Re: bts and new packages

2004-01-01 Thread Raphael Goulais
On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 04:11, Colin Watson wrote: > I've fixed this; it knows about it now. Thanks :) Raphael

bts and new packages

2003-12-31 Thread Raphael Goulais
Hi all, I sent three bug reports on a new package (airstrike), but the BTS still complains it doesn't know about this package. I can find it in the pool: http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/a/airstrike/ and the bugs are there: http://bugs.debian.org/airstrike But the bugs went to [EMAI

Re: Bug#208212: developer.php: please show binary package links sorted?

2003-09-02 Thread Raphael Goulais
On Monday 01 September 2003 19:41, Rene Engelhard wrote: > I know that display in the statusbar. The problem is not solved there > because you still have to go through all of them and look into the > statusbar It does not display in the statusbar. Igor added a "title" property, so it appears

Re: About requests for co-maintainers

2003-08-11 Thread Raphael Goulais
On Saturday 09 August 2003 09:29, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Jul 24 Luca - De Whiskey's - [0.7K] New wnpp tag: Request For > (Co-Maintainer|Help|Whatever) > > Unfortunately I haven't had the time yet to say it's probably a good > idea, and noone else said anything. What are the steps required t

About requests for co-maintainers

2003-08-08 Thread Raphael Goulais
Hi, Reading the thread about nm process on debian devel, I learned the mutt maintainer was willing to co-maintain mutt. I wondered how I could have found this information ... and did not found it. Some maintainers use the PTS to advertise this ... but you have to check the package on the PTS