Re: buildd chroot creation: who should get notified of failures?

On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > I think they should keep going to DSA and we should take care of them. > > Maybe we should just log them to disk. Continuing to send mails about > failures seems not too useful. And in turn also run the dsa-check-dchroots-current

Re: buildd chroot creation: who should get notified of failures?

e errors. > > > I think they should keep going to DSA and we should take care of them. Maybe we should just log them to disk. Continuing to send mails about failures seems not too useful. Cheers, -- | .''`. ** Debian ** Pete

Bug#818576: please provide more context in the title tag

** Debian ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal https://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `-https://www.debian.org/

[rt.debian.org #5997] Resolved: Adding holger and mattia to gids qa and qa-core

SIGNATURE- Complete Ticket History Subject: Adding holger and mattia to gids qa and qa-core From: Peter Palfrader Time: Sat Oct 17 12:26:31 2015 On Sat Oct 10 16:24:40 2015, debian-qa@lists.debian

Re: [rt.debian.org #5997] Adding holger and mattia to gids qa and qa-core

gt; > Are you sure you want mattia in qa-core also? > > finger mat...@db.debian.org tricked me in believing he's a DD, I > should have asked the keyring instead. Just "qa" is fine. Great, thanks. -- | .''`. ** Debian **

[rt.debian.org #5997] Adding holger and mattia to gids qa and qa-core

On Sat Oct 10 16:24:40 2015, debian-qa@lists.debian.org wrote: > please add holger and mattia to gids qa and qa-core . Added holger to qa-core. Added mattia to qa. Are you sure you want mattia in qa-core also?

Re: moving edos.debian.net to qa.debian.org?

static content onto our static-mirrors. Either would work for us. -- | .''`. ** Debian ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `-http://www.debian.org

Re: request to install newer version of descripts on quantz

t hits testing. > > So we'll hold off on installing the backport, I think that means. It's already been installed. apt-get will just consider it a candidate once an update hits backports. Cheers, -- | .''`. ** Debian ** Peter Pa

Re: patch for adding libjson-perl to quantz

gitorious to fakeupstream.cgi.) Done. -- | .''`. ** Debian ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSU

Re: PTS: host static files on static.d.o?

know more before agreeing: How much data are we talking about (how many files, how many gigs)? What's the expected churn per update. You already answered update frequency. What's left on the current packages.qa.d.o that would not be moved? Cheers, weasel --

Re: UDD chokes on debbugs data

mirrored using DSA's > inotify+rsync tool... Is there a way to trigger a throughout check to > see if something might have been left in an inconsistent state? (maybe > it's due to the VM migration last week-end) Can you check if the file in question is really different o

Re: UDD migration to ullmann.debian.org

epends on other hosts, it's not too representative. You should probably benchmark queries, not imports. -- | .''`. ** Debian ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating

Re: checking buildd logs

g vhost on grieg. That might make things simpler. Cheers, -- | .''`. ** Debian ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `-http://www.debian.org/

Re: Load on udd.d.o

or even 5 years with new systems, we couldn't afford it. Not by a long shot. -- | .''`. ** Debian ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System |

Re: Load on udd.d.o

n a VACUUM FULL once per month. > This doesn't solve the root issue, though. CLUSTERing specific tables might be cheaper in my experience. -- | .''`. ** Debian ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.pa

Re: Load on udd.d.o

y picked the wrong tool/service to rely on. UDD cannot be fast by design. It's a data dump that tries to collect as much information as possible, not facilitate fast and efficient queries. Cheers, -- | .''`. ** Debian ** Peter Pal

Re: Load on udd.d.o

like that tho. -- | .''`. ** Debian ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.

make spohr a partial mirror

archs for UDD. Thanks, -- | .''`. ** Debian ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema

Re: replacement of merkel services in DDPortfolio

an.org machines you need not use -h and -b. weasel -- | .''`. ** Debian ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `-http:/

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

n the same machine. > > We can survive without it using some synchronization scripts, but it > would make life easier to do that. We won't be able to do local mirrors of everything. That's just prohibitly expensive. We might be able to provide an archive mirror an

Re: Merkel going away

o ries. > > Does that mean every DD can login to ries and that qa.debian.org will > also move to ries? yes. and no. I think the plan was to move qa to salieri, tho nothing has been done on that front yet. HTH -- | .''`. ** Debian G

TZ changes on merkel might affect your crontab

your crontab. Cheers, weasel -- | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBS

changes to the use of sudo on project machines

lowly updating the machines to use the new config. Please see https://dsawiki.debian.org/dsawiki/New-Sudo for per machine progress status. Cheers, weasel [is there a list that all buildd admins are on?] -- | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **

Re: Reworking the http://qa.debian.org/ website

On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > In december, I worked a bit on the QA website[1]. Is debcheck linked from somewhere? Is it still useful? Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [rt.debian.org #286] merkel should be upgraded to etch

On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Peter Palfrader wrote: > Therefore we'll probably upgrade merkel from sarge to etch some time > this week. This has been done now and it looks like at least some things still work. If you notice any oddities please file tickets in RT and/or hunt me down on

Re: [rt.debian.org #286] merkel should be upgraded to etch

''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: developer.php reporting wrong key for weasel

On Mon, 02 Aug 2004, Igor Genibel wrote: > Le samedi 31 Juillet 2004 00:07, Peter Palfrader a écrit : > > Hi everyone, > > Hi Peter, > > > | General information: (collapse) GPG key id: [2]D097A261 > > > >

developer.php reporting wrong key for weasel

Hi everyone, http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=weasel shows: | Packages overview for Peter Palfrader | | General information: (collapse) GPG key id: [2]D097A261 | [3]Non-fixed bugs, most recent first This

Re: Maybe remove premail...

On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-24 10:22]: > > premail has a few old, functional bugs open. It's in contrib, hasn't been > > changed since woody released, and I can't find it's upstream. > > > > I think you can achieve similar functiona

Bug#236131: developer.php: PGP keys from public keyserver not found

Andreas Barth schrieb am Donnerstag, dem 04. März 2004: > * Igor Genibel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040304 18:55]: > > Currently the ddpo backend uses keyserver.debian.net for gathering > > gpg keys for "non-debian-keyring" present developer. But this server is > > a round-robbin link to keyserver.fabbi

Re: qca-tls NMU needed?

On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Jan Niehusmann wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 02:17:11PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > I'm the annoying person that filed so many bugs on your qca-tls package :) > > > > I wonder if you need some help in fixing them. If you are busy right &

qca-tls NMU needed?

Hi, I'm the annoying person that filed so many bugs on your qca-tls package :) I wonder if you need some help in fixing them. If you are busy right now I could do a NMU if you want, fixing all the outstanding bugs. This would include making qca-tls a non-native package among other things, also

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Le Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 03:36:45AM +0100, Peter Palfrader écrivait: > > To make absolutely certain that we did not forget anything, I would like > > to propose the following: > > > > > > I have made a copy of /org/qa

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Le Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 05:57:05PM +1100, Martin Michlmayr écrivait: > > Let's restore qa.d.o. I have checked CVS and it looks okay. However, > > So where are we ? I'm still waiting for the MX DNS entry in order to have > a fully working PTS ... >

Bug#223652: qa.debian.org: developer.php -- data not updating

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Igor Genibel wrote: > * Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-11 02:21:06 -0500]: > > > I'm sure that you're aware of this, but I just wanted to remind you that > > the data on the developer.php pages hasn't been updated since the > > break-in: > > > > ===8<==

Let's remove multi-gnome-terminal

multi-gnome-terminal has several important bugs and no reverse depends. Only issue is that we released it with woody. Are there any objections to removing it from sid/testing? Peter -- PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** messages preferred.| : :' : The univ

Should libfltk1 be removed?

Hi, libfltk1 is orphaned, is in oldlibs, and only one package still depends on it (if I'm not mistaken). Juan, any chance you can rebuild pose against fltk1.1 in the near future so fltk is not needed at all anymore? Peter -- PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** messag

Re: should request-tracker be removed?

On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 06:22:11AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > request tracker has several important and grave bugs - open for over > > half a year. If I trust John Goerzen in #191165 the "Command-line > > utilities tot

should request-tracker be removed?

Hi, request tracker has several important and grave bugs - open for over half a year. If I trust John Goerzen in #191165 the "Command-line utilities totally inoperable as shipped". Maybe we should remove request tracker? Peter -- PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **

Bug#219753: http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php doesn't respect arch-specific build-deps

On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 01:56:20AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > > > > Package declares a build time dependency on hurd-dev (>= 20020608-1) > > > > > [hurd-i386] which cannot be satisfied on i386. > > > &g

Bug#219753: http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php doesn't respect arch-specific build-deps

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:15:38AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > > Package declares a build time dependency on hurd-dev (>= 20020608-1) > > > [hurd-i386] which cannot be satisfied on i386. > > > > Ah :) > >

Have an unbuildable column in developer.php?

Hi, right now you list which packages are not installable on developer.php. IMO it would also be interesting which packages are not buildable due to missing build depends. Peter -- PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** messages preferred.| : :' : The universal

Bug#219753: http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php doesn't respect arch-specific build-deps

On Sat, 08 Nov 2003, Jeff Bailey wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: normal > > http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=glibc shows > the following: > > BuildDepends > > Package declares a build time dependency on hurd-dev (>= 20020608-1) > [hurd-i386] which cannot be sa

Re: /org/qa.debian.org/data/ftp not being updated?

On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 01:34:55PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > It seems /org/qa.debian.org/data/ftp is not being updated. Can you > > take a look at this, weasel? > > > > -rw-rw-r--1 weasel qa4002763 Sep 7 01:13 > > /org/qa.debian

Re: Bug #178060: debian/copyright incorrent... Tagging for testing query.

On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Paul Hampson wrote: > Bug #178060 (in libxml2) is holding libxml2 2.5.3-1 out of > testing, compared to 2.4.24-1. > > The question is, since this is also true of 2.4.24-1 (I > just checked then) would it be bad to tag this bug with > 'sarge' as well as 'sid'? It would of cou

Re: Outdated information

On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 04:39:08PM +0100, Igor Genibel wrote: > > > % host -T ftp.uk.debian.org > > > ftp.uk.debian.org 3375CNAME ukdebian.mirror.anlx.net > > > ukdebian.mirror.anlx.net78975 A 81.91.108.245 > > > > > > (broken

Re: Stop!

On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Matthew Vernon wrote: > Please please stop sending these semi-automated emails to debian-qa > bug reports! My mailbox is groaning under the load of the BTS barfing > on your emails. As if this was intentional... Peter -- PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Li

Re: Tool to orphan packages

On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > The current maintainer of cplay, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package - now. If you want to be the new maintainer, please take it -- retitle - this bug from 'O:' to 'ITA:', fix th

cipe-source: fails to create .deb

Do you intent to fix #146569 any time soon? If not I could perhaps NMU a new version. yours, peter [If you've downloaded my PGP key before please redownload it for I've changed cipher preferences: gpg --keyserver pgp.

Re: GnomeMeeting 0.12.2 versus 0.85.1

On Sun, 08 Dec 2002, Colin Watson wrote: > On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 09:04:55AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > On Sun, 08 Dec 2002, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > > * No build failures for an arch where the package has previously > > > been successfully built. > >

Re: GnomeMeeting 0.12.2 versus 0.85.1

On Sun, 08 Dec 2002, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > The criteria is quite simple. All these must be fullfilled. > > * Upload at least X days old (where X=10 for a urgency low). > * No RC bugs filed against the package. Make that: * Less RC bugs than the current version in testing. > * No build failures

closing efuns bugs

Efuns has been removed from Debian GNU/Linux on request of the Debian QA group: quoting ftp-master: | We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following | package(s) have been removed from unstable: | | efuns | 0.17.0.3-2 | source, i386, alpha | gwml | 0.17.0.3-2 | i386,

Re: Bug#126687: Closing

On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 12:41:13PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > It happens often enough imho, please add it. > > Please offer facts and not opinions as corroborating evidence :) xanim (2.80.1-17) unstable; urgency=low * Cha

Re: Bug#126687: Closing

On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 03:13:00AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > > Pity this bug wasn't noticed earlier -- there is just one package in sid > > > with the old address, but it wouldn't even match since it's misspelled: > > > > > > Package: junkfilter > >

Re: removing efuns?

# On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Jérôme Marant wrote: # > Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: # > > efuns does not build from source and did not for over two years now. # > # > I asked for its removal (#166524). It is no longer maintained # > upstream and does not bui

removing efuns?

retitle 122075 O: efuns -- EMACS in Objective Caml (plus support libraries) thanks Hi, efuns does not build from source and did not for over two years now. There's an open RFA on wnpp (#122075), while Brent Fulgham claims in #67459 that in fact he orphaned it (retitling now). Cyrille, you talked

Re: Processed: reassign 166527 to qa.debian.org

On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:33:10PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > > reassign 166527 qa.debian.org > > Bug#166527: developer.php: not picking up package that exists only in > > experimental > > Bug reassigned from package `

Re: Bug#127974: O: epan -- offline ethernet protocol analyzer

On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Colin Watson wrote: > On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 03:12:25AM +0100, Angel Ramos wrote: > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: normal > > > > I haven't the source code and I can't solve the bugs there are opened. > > Not much to do about this package. I orphane it. > > > > > > Pack

Re: websec_1.3.4-9_i386.changes REJECTED

On Tue, 03 Sep 2002, Joop Stakenborg wrote: > On Tue, 03 Sep 2002 11:02:58 -0400 > Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Rejected: no signature found in websec_1.3.4-9_i386.changes. > > Rejected: no signature found in websec_1.3.4-9.dsc. > > > > Woops, I goofed! According to de

(fwd) Cron /org/qa.debian.org/data/cronjobs/cvs-update

Whoever changed the CVS in /org/qa.debian.org/data to not be anonymous pserver please change it back. - Forwarded message from Cron Daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cron Daemon) Subject: Cron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /org/qa.debian.org/data/cronjobs/cvs-update To: [EMAIL P

Bug#159058: qa.debian.org: debcheck.php doesn't like ++ in package names

retitle 159058 developer/index.php makes wrong links thanks On Sun, 01 Sep 2002, Brian M. Carlson wrote: > When I access > > from , > debcheck.php gives me the e

Re: old ITP's

On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Below's a list of the bug tahtw will be renamed. The "filed" and > "changed" fields in the list are the number of days that have past since > the bug was opened, and since any addition was made to the report, > respectively. > #85612 mixmaster

#77740 - vchkpw: Virtual POP-domains and users for qmail

retitle 77740 O: vchkpw -- Virtual POP-domains and users for qmail retitle 68637 O: vchkpw -- Virtual POP-domains and users for qmail thanks Sean, as you didn't do an upload for almost a year I have changed your ITA back to O:. If you still want it please retitle back and upload a package.

Re: deps

On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Michele Mazzucchi wrote: > Installing vchkpw debian package, i noted that it depends on ucspi-tcp-src. > Can you maybe set dep on "ucspi-tcp-src | ucspi-tcp"? > People could have installed && built ucspi-tcp and removed sources... I will make a QA upload. I hope replacing -

Re: Bug#153636: Orphaned gnu-smalltalk

On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Brett Cundal wrote: > > > I intend to adopt this package... I've been given the OK by Alex some > > time ago. I have packages ready to go, but I'm not currently a Debian > > Developer. > &g

Re: Bug#153636: Orphaned gnu-smalltalk

On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Brett Cundal wrote: > I intend to adopt this package... I've been given the OK by Alex some > time ago. I have packages ready to go, but I'm not currently a Debian > Developer. Nice. > I'll file an ITA soon if that's appropriate - I'm just following up > here to make sure ev

debcheck and ftp-get updated

Hi QA, I've updated debcheck http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php>: unstable, testing, and stable have been replaced by sid, sarge, woody, and potato. If a status (unstable..) is passed as parameter it is replaced by the correct codename. I've also changed our ftp-get script which fetches the Pack

gnu-smalltalk orphaned

gnu-smalltalk's maintainer, Alexander Shinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, seems to be MIA/AWOL. He hasn't been around for almost two years according to echelon and the last 3 uploads have been NMUs. This is Alex' only package in the archive. I've sent an Orphan bug to wnpp and prepare an upload with change

boa

[ To raise the noise in the spam/noise ratio something on-topic. ] Jonathan Nelson wrote in Mail to some user that he no longer is a Developer. Since I cannot find any trace of him leaving the project I sent mail to ask for confirmation. In the meanwhile I'm preparing a QA upload for boa which wi

Re: woody

On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Nick Jacobs wrote: >How many people are using Debian > GNU/Linux on hppa, anyway? Enough to have started and to maintain the hppa port. You realize that you are extremly rude to those people who spend much time to port Debian to those archs. If you want to sp

Re: RFC: debian-qa-packages

Hi, On Sun, 21 Oct 2001, Colin Watson wrote: > If there's consensus here then I'll request a new mailing list as > follows: > > 1. Name > debian-qa-packages > Comments? Go for it! yours, peter -- PGP sign

Re: Bug#108717: qa.debian.org: debcheck: new architectures for woody and sid

Hi Colin! On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Colin Watson wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: wishlist > > Currently, debcheck only tracks the six architectures we released with > potato, regardless of whether you're looking at stable, testing, or > unstable. It should also track these architectures:

Re: NMU or not?

Hi Bas! On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Hi! > > When building packages that are orphaned and have maintainer set to the > QA team, should I consider my uploads NMU's, or not? No, consider them as normal maintainer uploads. yours,

permissions on qa/web and qa/wml

Hi, is there any reason why /org/qa.debian.org/wml and /org/qa.debian.org/web on pandora are owned by group qa-ctte rather than qa? It really sucks to work on something without direct write access and always having to wait for an hourly cron to update stuff. So unless there is a really good just

Re: Changing maintainer field for QA.

Hi Matej! On Wed, 04 Apr 2001, Matej Vela wrote: > I see your point, but there's no need to make extra work for ourselves. > It would be better to create something like debian-qa-discuss and move > to it right away... This would be a solution but somehow I like debian-qa as a list for discussion

Re: Packages in main depending on contrib|nonfree (was: scripts on pandora)

Hi Malcolm! On Wed, 04 Apr 2001, Malcolm Parsons wrote: > Several of those packages have Depends: mpg321 | mpg123 > > mpg321 is in main, mpg123 is not. > > I think that should be allowed, because the dependency can be satisfied with > stuff in main. It is now.

Re: Packages in main depending on contrib|nonfree (was: scripts on pandora)

Hi Petr! On Wed, 04 Apr 2001, Petr Cech wrote: > > Anyone going to stop me? > > no. But it seems to have problems with (libungif | giflib). This is/should be > allowed, no? Yes, this should be ok Thanks for pointing this out Petr, Joy and David. After fixing this bug the following packages stil

Re: Packages in main depending on contrib|nonfree (was: scripts on pandora)

Hi Josip! On Wed, 04 Apr 2001, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 05:06:17PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > > Packages in main may not depend or recommend > > > stuff outside of main. > > > > > > See http://qa.

Packages in main depending on contrib|nonfree (was: scripts on pandora)

> Packages in main may not depend or recommend > stuff outside of main. > > See http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?list=withinmain&arch=ANY for the > list of packages that violate this. I intent to file bugs with severity serious against the packages listed on this sit

Changing maintainer field for QA.

Currently the signal/noise ratio on this list is really bad (if you consider bug reports and dinstall messages as noise). Maybe we should stop using <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as a Maintainer: address for packages maintained by QA and use somthing like <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. For now this should be setup t

Re: scripts on pandora

On Tue, 03 Apr 2001, Joey Hess wrote: > Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > weasel has added a page about "Stats on broken Depends, Oldlibs, > > Priorities etc." at http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php [ btw, the > > link to 'heavy' _is_ heavy. Give your browser a couple of minutes > > to render the page ]

Re: scripts on pandora

On Tue, 03 Apr 2001, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > weasel has added a page about "Stats on broken Depends, Oldlibs, > Priorities etc." at http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php [ btw, the > link to 'heavy' _is_ heavy. Give your browser a couple of minutes > to render the page ] The text browsers (links,

qa wml cvs - .cvsignore file

Hi, Are there any reasons for not importing a .cvsignore file into wml? Something like *.html *.php If I don't hear back from you, I'll import such a file. yours, peter -- PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** D

qa cvs and pserver

Hi, Could you please add the QA cvs repository to klecker:/org/cvs.debian.org/cvswrappers: --- cvswrapper Fri Mar 9 19:37:02 2001 +++ /org/home/weasel/cvswrapper Mon Apr 2 02:33:18 2001 @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ --allow-root=/cvs/pgsql-deb \ --allow-root=/cvs/dak \ --allow-root=/cvs/debian-gcc \ +-

Re: Some QA activity...

Hi Martin! On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010318 19:40]: > > - As mentioned before, I want to set up a CVS rep for such scripts > > and for the WML (web) data. Yes, the QA web site sucks. > > OK, James was to nice and created a CVS rep for QA.

Re: Broken Dependencies, Broken Priorities and Oldlibs

On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > * tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010221 19:11]: > > > How about setting up a CVS repository to keep QA tools like this in > > > a central place. I know many people have little scripts which are > > > useful for Q

Re: Broken Dependencies, Broken Priorities and Oldlibs

On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010221 19:11]: > > How about setting up a CVS repository to keep QA tools like this in > > a central place. I know many people have little scripts which are > > useful for QA work and it would be nice to put them all toge

Bug#87524: vstream: build failure

Hi, On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Ben Collins wrote: > Package: vstream > Severity: serious > > This package fails to build because of recent changes in libc6-dev to be > more standards compliant. The file stream.c fails to compile with this: This bug should already be resolved by an upload I did yester

Bug#87480: 3dchess override disparity

Package: 3dchess Severity: minor Version: 0.8.1-7 The Override file is correct, set Priority to optional next time you make an upload. Hi QA, On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Debian Installer wrote: > There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the > override file for the following fil

Re: hylafax-server and no setup.cache

Hi Matthias! On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Matthias Pannek wrote: > Hello, > > sorry...this Bug is no Bug...my fault :/ > (#87471 and #87469) If you're sure those are not bugs, please send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a short explanation why you closed the bug. Thanks.

Re: Work-needing packages report for Feb 23, 2001

Hi Marcelo! On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > [NEW] 3dchess (#87154), orphaned today > > Current maintainer: [something not Debian QA] > > Can someone here please take care of this? Allow some reasonable > timeframe (I'd say no more t

(fwd) Re: Work-needing packages report for Feb 23, 2001

[Gah, wrong To header, sorry Marcelo] - Forwarded message from Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Work-needing packages report for Feb 23, 2001 To: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri

Broken Dependencies, Broken Priorities and Oldlibs

Hi, I just hacked some scripts to check for broken Depends and such in sid: | Number of packages with broken | Pre-Depends || ALL | alpha | arm | i386 | m68k | powerpc | sparc | || 5 | | 5 | | 5| 5 | | | | Depends || ALL | alpha | arm | i386 | m68k |

Re: Need for a test suite

Hi Anthony, Hi Debian-QA! On Fri, 02 Feb 2001, Anthony Towns wrote: > There are actually at least three sorts of tests we can do: > We can also > check packages don't depend on lower priority packages There are currently approx

Re: Updating the realplayer package for RealPlayer 8

Hi! On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Matthew Campbell wrote: > I don't know how you handle contributions from people who aren't registered > Debian developers, Help is always welcome, thanks! > --- realplayer.orig/debian/postinst Tue Sep 12 05:01:19 2000 > +++ realplayer/debian/postinstSun Dec 31

Uploaded xipmsg 0.8087-6 (source i386) to auric_ccqa

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 00:37:58 + Source: xipmsg Binary: xipmsg Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.8087-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Descr

Uploaded sciplot 1.36-5 (source i386) to auric_ccqa

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 01:15:52 +0100 Source: sciplot Binary: sciplot1 sciplot-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.36-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTEC

Uploaded grafix 1.6-2 (source i386) to auric_ccqa

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 00:42:09 +0100 Source: grafix Binary: grafix1 grafix-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.6-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Installed grafix 1.6-1 (i386 source)

Hi Martin! On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001227 22:14]: > > > Source: grafix > > > Binary: grafix1 grafix-dev > > > > Is there any reason you uploaded this as a native debian package? > > Ah

Re: Installed grafix 1.6-1 (i386 source)

Hi Michael, On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Debian QA Group wrote: > Source: grafix > Binary: grafix1 grafix-dev > Architecture: source i386 [...] > a6e87478b260396106da02bb37249383 582 math optional grafix_1.6-1.dsc > 2394c25abe13a8c489d75667d80ec3aa 301517 math optional grafix_1.6-1.tar.gz > 453571c8cb

  1   2   >