Re: woody

2002-04-02 Thread Nick Jacobs
--- Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 12:47:10PM -0800, Nick Jacobs > wrote: > > You simply have the facts wrong - none of those > packages have > > RELEASE-CRITICAL bugs for i386. I refer you to the list > of > > releas

Re: woody

2002-04-01 Thread Nick Jacobs
--- Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nick Jacobs wrote: > > Certainly not. Waiting for hppa (etc) support has > > delayed release of woody - that's a fact. > > That's strange, I thought that the existance of 20 > release critical > bugs that no

Re: woody

2002-04-01 Thread Nick Jacobs
--- Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Nick Jacobs wrote: > > >How many people are using Debian > > GNU/Linux on hppa, anyway? > > Enough to have started and to maintain the hppa port. You > realize that > you a

woody

2002-03-29 Thread Nick Jacobs
It's great that Debian releases can build on several architectures. That's a policy worth keeping, even though it has delayed the release of Woody. But trying to support as many as 11 architectures doesn't seem sensible either. Why not drop the 3 or 4 architectures that have the most release-criti