Re: xlibs-dev transition; packages with adjusted dependencies needing upload

On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 02:34:00PM +1100, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Marc Singer wrote: > >I'd like to be able to inspect the state of the system when configure > >is running. The buildd doesn't show me the command it is running. Is > &

Re: xlibs-dev transition; packages with adjusted dependencies needing upload

On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 07:12:57PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > I'd like to be able to inspect the state of the system when configure > > is running. The buildd doesn't show me the command it is running. Is > > there a way I can emulate it? > You could sh -x ./configure, or check the config.lo

Re: xlibs-dev transition; packages with adjusted dependencies needing upload

On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 01:44:31PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 10:48:48PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Explanation for this problem is here: > > > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-autoconf/2005-09/msg00023.html > > > > Simple

Re: xlibs-dev transition; packages with adjusted dependencies needing upload

On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:25:47AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 02:17:06PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 03:57:01AM +0100, Amaya wrote: > > > Marc Singer wrote: > > > > I was wrong, the package does use auto

Re: xlibs-dev transition; packages with adjusted dependencies needing upload

On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 03:57:01AM +0100, Amaya wrote: > Marc Singer wrote: > > I was wrong, the package does use autoconf. I'm not doing the build, > > the autobuilder is. > > Here is what vorlon tought me to do: > > cd packagesrc-0.0/ > autoconf I don

Re: xlibs-dev transition; packages with adjusted dependencies needing upload

On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 10:48:48PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:29:44PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:22:45PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > > Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > I&#x

Re: xlibs-dev transition; packages with adjusted dependencies needing upload

On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:22:45PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'm getting a build failure on s390 for the updated package. For some > > reason, the libX11.a librarary isn't being found by ld. It'

Re: xlibs-dev transition; packages with adjusted dependencies needing upload

On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 02:21:36AM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > Marc Singer wrote: > > buici-clock > > > I guess I'm going to have to pull the s390 x11-dev package to look at > > it. > > You need to replace xlibs-dev dependency by the appropriate dev-p

Re: xlibs-dev transition; packages with adjusted dependencies needing upload

On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:11:45PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote: > On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 02:02:57AM +0100, Amaya wrote: > > Marc Singer wrote: > > > I'm getting a build failure on s390 for the updated package. For some > > > > Which one? > > buici-clock

Re: xlibs-dev transition; packages with adjusted dependencies needing upload

On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 02:02:57AM +0100, Amaya wrote: > Marc Singer wrote: > > I'm getting a build failure on s390 for the updated package. For some > > Which one? buici-clock It builds on ix86, but I don't use a chroot jail for building. > > > reason,

Re: xlibs-dev transition; packages with adjusted dependencies needing upload

I'm getting a build failure on s390 for the updated package. For some reason, the libX11.a librarary isn't being found by ld. It's looking in /usr/X11R6/lib. Am I misunderstanding another change in the X11 libraries? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe

Re: xlibs-dev transition; packages with adjusted dependencies needing upload

On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 01:07:36AM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote: > Justin Pryzby wrote: > >Packages with RC bugs due to the xlibs-dev transition are listed at: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]:transition-xlibs-dev&repeatmerged=no&tagexcl=patch#_2_2_5 > > > >I've gone and fi

Re: Makeing Debian more secure - sign binaries with elfsign?

On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 10:13:29AM +0200, Andreas Kotes wrote: > hm. thinking of that, ELF signing might help for only part of the > system. nonetheless, having /sbin/init, the interpreters, basic system > utilities (fbset, fdisk, e2fsck) verifyable without having to run a > full-blown file modific

Re: Helping busy maintainers

On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 07:51:12PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-13 19:11]: > > #189751: lanoche: depends on non-existent xviddetect > > > > I wonder if this is a good candidate to be dropped since removing > > the

Re: chroot on debian hosts?

On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 09:37:51AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 06:20:15PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote: > > (I thought I sent this, but now I cannot find it to be sure.) > > > > I'd like to build against sid on a machine (ia64) I don't own

chroot on debian hosts?

(I thought I sent this, but now I cannot find it to be sure.) I'd like to build against sid on a machine (ia64) I don't own but which Debian does have available. I tried the recipe from the developer's manual using fakeroot. It failed because it could not find a package. Perhaps, this is a bug

Re: building in a chroot

On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 02:28:36PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-13 19:36]: > > This mail, > > <http://zork.net/pipermail/lnx-bbc-devel/2002-November/002102.html> > > talks about one method of making a chroot. I

building in a chroot

I think that I need to build in a chroot environment in order to test-build a changed I've made to a package. I'd do this on my dev machine, but the problem occurs on ia64, only. This mail, talks about one method of making a chro

Chasing #203336, gcvs compile problem in ia64

Please let me know if someone else is working on it.

Re: Helping busy maintainers

#189751: lanoche: depends on non-existent xviddetect Package: lanoche; Severity: serious; Reported by: Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 177 days old. I've looked into this one a bit. The program displays an HTML report of the hardware on a computer. I wonder if this is a good candid