On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 11:13:44 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Jul 2004, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > That is, an attacker could submit a print job containing PostScript
> > commands which, when interpreted by gs, would open files, etc. with the
> > privileges of cups-pdf (apparently,
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 10:53:58 +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> you uploaded a new version of gtk-doc the 2003-06-19 (maintainer:
> debian-qa) to fix a few bugs, but you forgot the #196073 one, which were
> marked pending by the maintainer before orphaning, and not fixed.
I didn't forget it. I was
Package: qa.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-10-26
Severity: normal
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
generates an incomplete overview of my packages: it does not list libgsf
(http://packages.qa.debian.org/libg/libgsf.html). Most likely this has to do
with libgsf only existing i
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 21:19:36 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> upstream source. I don't know if we should upload it to frozen or if we
> should remove xfce from potato and only upload the new version to woody as
> suggested in the bub report #60258.
I'd second that suggestion. Unlike the old ver
On Sat, Jan 22, 2000 at 14:41:32 +0100, Rodrigo Fernandez-Vizarra Bonet wrote:
> $year = (localtime(time())->year);
> Actual date 22-0-100
This is not a Y2K problem in perl, but a case of not reading the relevant
part of the fine perl manual. Quoting perlfunc(1p) on localtime:
:Also, $year is the
On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 22:31:10 -0800, David R. Whipple wrote:
> We are trying to port the Linux OS to run on a Motorola MPC603e (similar
> to the MPC8xx boards) .
The October 1999 issue of Linux journal has an article
"Porting Linux to a Power PC Board" by He Zhu and Xiaoqiang Chen
[An experime
On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 11:13:40 +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Ray Dassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[That's my old address BTW; it still works though]
> is working on a free replacement; if anyone wants to help finish it, I'm
> sure he would appreciate it.
It's more accurate to say I have framework co
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 17:50:30 +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
> Does anybody use 9wm, 9term, and 9fonts? Can we dump them?
9term and 9fonts provide for the only UTF-8 (unicode) capable terminal
emulation for X currently packaged AFAIK; it would be convenient to have
them available for i18n testing p
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 18:11:06 +0200, Peter Makholm wrote:
> #41356 lesstifg-dev: should depend on xlib6g-dev
>
> Any comments on that?
Just an AOL. It should indeed.
> I think I had some more comments, but I have no connection to
> bugs.debian.org and can not research them. (think I have some
On Wed, Aug 18, 1999 at 09:54:21 +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> I've noticed ispell is orphaned, and intend to adopt it (I'll post
> the intent formally a bit later) - but I'd like to get hold of upstream
> if at all possible, and the web address given in the source returns me
> 404, which m
lopment changes or moves).
Ray
--
J.H.M. Dassen | RUMOUR Believe all you hear. Your world may
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | not be a better one than the one the blocks
| live in but it'll be a sight more vivid.
On Wed, May 05, 1999 at 20:33:13 -0500, Chris Mazuc wrote:
> I wish to take over as packager for mozilla,
Several people are currently working on getting up to date mozilla packages;
their current work can be found on va.debian.org in ~joy/mozilla . Please
get in touch with Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PRO
Package: electric-fence
Version: 2.0.5-4.1
Electric Fence 2.1 has been released; see
http://freshmeat.net/news/1999/04/09/923681673.html
Bruce is explicitly asking for patches (prior to working on thread-safety),
so it would be cool if #33185 got fixed now too.
Ray
--
Cyberspace, a final fronti
On Thu, Apr 01, 1999 at 00:28:27 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 11:44:12PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > If not, I will fix some bugs and change the maintainer to debian-qa.
>
> Actually, I'm not expert enough in RPC to fix it. It references
> members of the RPC structur
Currently, there are over a hundered bug reports in the bug tracking system
that are filed under "maintainer unknown"
(http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/ma/l-28_unknown-29_.html).
In my experience, there are a few categories to be seen in these
- Bug reports with missing Package: pseudo-header (or one
On Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 16:16:03 -0800, Brent A. Fulgham wrote:
> I noticed that our most recent mozilla build is circa Oct 1998.
That was the last time it built on a slink system, before the switch to Gtk
as the standard GUI library (which required a newer Gtk than slink had).
> I plan on attemp
On Fri, Feb 12, 1999 at 23:08:43 +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Are you planning to make a new NMU of libpam for slink to fix
> the bogus dependency?
No I'm not, as I've already done that:
lftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/debian/home/ftp/private/project/Incoming> ls
-l *pam* | grep jdassen
-rw-r--r-- 1 j
On Fri, Feb 12, 1999 at 03:06:47 -0500, Brian White wrote:
> libpam0g-util 33238 libpam0g-util: bogus cracklib2 dependency. [0]
> (Debian QA Group )
This is fixed in pam_0.65-0.9 which is currently in Incoming.
Ray
--
LEADERSHIP A form of self-preservation exhibited by people with auto-
;
CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
"J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: sudo and cracklib
Apologies for the personal cc's, but I *really* want to make sure this
message gets noticed.
Guy Maor wrote:
> Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Package: electric-fence
Version: 2.0.5-4
README.debian does not explain how to use Electric Fence from within gdb
without having to relink the binary. One can find out how to do this by
perusing the gdb docs thoroughly, but it would be nice if this readme would
include an enlightening example, lik
Package: electric-fence
Version: 2.0.5-4
AFAIK the upstream release of Electric Fence doesn't utilise the trick of
making it into a shared library like the current Debian package does.
Please forward this trick upstream; it is very useful not to have to relink
a binary in order to use Electric Fen
On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 19:56:36 +, Jonathan H N Chin wrote:
> > OK. I've just reassigned it to mozilla. Do you think "Severity:
> > wishlist" is appropriate for it?
>
> I consider it to be a significant bug.
> If I run lynx, I don't expect it to create a .mosaic directory.
> If I use emacs, I
This morning, I uploaded a mozilla (latest tarball) compiled with the fixed
libc6 and libstdc++2.9. It no longer dumps core immediately after startup,
and should be somewhat usable again (it's still alpha code of course). It is
marked Maintainer: Debian QA group .
This means #26712, #27181, #29149
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 03:46:58PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> While you're all on this thread, what about mozilla?
The current Debian package doesn't work with the current libc (#27181,
severity: grave).
> I was going to ask Brian for an extension for mozilla as I won't make
> 00:00 Saturday
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 01:59:51PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> If this issue can't be resolved before the release is made, can we please
> remove the package out of slink.
I agree. It would have been nice to have a working mozilla in it, but it
appears to be unlikely.
> > I've seen suggestions
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 12:41:23PM -0400, James A. Treacy wrote:
> Has any progress been made on tracking down the cause of this bug.
Not really.
I've tried rebuilding the version that's currently in slink against the
latest libs; this made no difference (immediate coredump).
Yesterday I tried
26 matches
Mail list logo
