On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 08:46:52AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> If it's not being maintained, I intend to request removal of the
> package from unstable. The most recent version of the package is
> present in 'stable', so this incurs no loss of data and the package
> is easy to revive.
(FWIW,
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 05:56:05PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 09:24:15AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> >For the record: the PTS says that 1.0.8-1 has been uploaded to Unstable,
> >presumably by the maintainer.
>
> It FTBFS on powerpc. See:
>
> http://buildd
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 02:28:41AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> My suggestion is to leave alone any RFP from the past year. But older
> ones should be dealt with, I think:
>
> Many are wontfix, usually because of license problems. It seems to me
> that such things should eventually get dr
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 11:22:35AM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 03:21:50PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > [ request for wmsensors NMU ]
> >
> > Can someone please NMU?
>
> I can do this in a couple of hours if no one else has yet.
Oops. I
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 03:21:50PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> [ request for wmsensors NMU ]
>
> Can someone please NMU?
I can do this in a couple of hours if no one else has yet.
--
gram
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 12:34:35AM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
> Are there any plans to release gdm for gnome 2.4 ?
> Now debian has outdated version for Gnome 2.2 - look at
> http://www.jirka.org/gdm.html - "2.4.1.x are the GNOME2.2 stable
> versions,[..] 2.4.4.x are the GNOME 2.4 stable versions. [.
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 07:00:07PM +0100, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> Il lun, 2004-02-02 alle 18:40, Max Vozeler ha scritto:
> > Thanks Graham Wilson for uploading the new package.
>
> It's usually a good idea to put the name and email of the sponsor in the
> changelog.
>
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 06:29:12PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-14 15:16]:
> > I'd also like to add Fabien Ninoles to the list. I emailed him a few
> > days ago, and haven't heard back yet. He maintains maitains tkwo
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 02:18:05PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> First, the new entries:
>
> Peter T. Breuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: One source package (enbd), last upload
> on October 30; two RC bugs open since before then, plus an FTBFS.
>
> Timshell Knoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Last upload on Se
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:51:02PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> * hostname: Orphan and QA-upload. Check whether Doogie still exists.
I've talked to Adam and I am taking this. I will make a new upload asap.
--
gram
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:25:24PM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 08:56:04PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > multi-gnome-terminal has several important bugs and no
> > reverse depends.
> >
> > Only issue is that we released it with woody.
> >
> > Are there any objections
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 12:10:04AM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Stijn de Bekker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> RC bug with patch, also new upstream available.
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stijn seems to be fairly inactive. He has a number of bugs open for a
while, and addit
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 08:03:37AM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> "Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Marc, could you make an NMU? (Sorry, I'm not sure if you are a
> > developer or not, Cc'ing -qa because of that, so that someone there can
> > pick this up if needed)
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 12:10:04AM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Stijn de Bekker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> RC bug with patch, also new upstream available.
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have made an NMU of this package that fixes the RC bug (#210558).
--
gram
signat
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 07:13:37PM +0300, Jarno Elonen wrote:
> > Yuk. Non-compliant browsers again... which ones in particular do this?
>
> At least Konqueror 3.1.3. and Mozilla 1.4.
> Is there really some standard saying this shouldn't happen?
i believe that the newlines are treated as whitespa
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 02:12:19AM +, James Troup wrote:
> Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 05:19:12PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> >> i think the following packages should be removed from the archive:
> >>
&g
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 05:19:12PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> i think the following packages should be removed from the archive:
>
> filemenu-applet
> power-applet
> quickres-applet
> wavelan-applet
[...]
> if no one objects, i will file bugs against ftp.debian.org re
i think the following packages should be removed from the archive:
filemenu-applet
power-applet
quickres-applet
wavelan-applet
all of the packages depend on libpanel-applet0, which needs gnome-panel
1.4. this package, however, does not exist in debian anymore, as we have
moved to gnome 2 in unsta
18 matches
Mail list logo
