On Friday 18 March 2005 23:55, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 10:27:53PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> > On Friday 18 March 2005 19:37, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > One of my goals for etch is getting rid of all old libtool
> > > versions.
> > >
>
On Friday 18 March 2005 19:37, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> One of my goals for etch is getting rid of all old libtool
> versions.
>
> I'm still wondering on how exactly I'm going to do this. But I
> am thinking about getting all those packages to build depend on
> libtool, autoconf and automake.
$ grep
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 08:19:04AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> You need at least a fully up to date Woody box. There is likely enough
> version skew that you will end up needing new packages from Sarge. One
> possibility is you can use a chroot for compiling and testing the new
> packa
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 01:16:16PM -0300, Hilton Fernandes wrote:
> So, my question is: what do you think or do about software testing? Do you
> think it is unfeasible, due to the huge number of packages? Do you rely on
> informal user experience?
AFAICS the testing mechanism is the main "regr
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 05:18:40PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 11:37:50 +0100
> David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 04:32:47PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > [..]
> > > +this maintainer
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 04:32:47PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
[..]
> +this maintainer. Start by logging in to the http://db.debian.org";
> +name="Debian Developer's Database"> and doing a full search to
> +check whether the maintainer is on vacation and when they were
> +last seen. Collect
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 11:17:25PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> This is available on http://qa.debian.org now for bugs tagged help,
> security and unreproducible. Thanks to Torsten for adding the feature
> to search for tags (keywords) to the BTS LDAP interface.
>
> Anything else we need?
Ju
Hi!
Today I tried to review some of the RC bugs in base.d.o and standard.d.o
and add comments on the packages so that one can see what is happening
with the bugs.
Wichert for example says in #112499(grave) that he is preparing an
upload for the current version of openldap to fix a bunch of bugs.
uot;(.*)\"/;
my $to = $1;
if (not defined $from or not defined $to) {
die "bad translation at pair $i";
The first is a simple typo, and the second relaxes the format, so that
all string get parsed correctly.
The Language_fr.pm has both problems too!
Please apply this patch and fix it for the french version too.
Regards, David Schmitt
9 matches
Mail list logo
