Bug#985875: DDPO: watch should warn about expired upstream signing keys

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hello, the upstream signing key debian/upstream/signing-key.asc might have expired. It seems the process that leads to the DDPO dashboard happily ignores such a situation and continues operation. While this shouldn't do harm in the rare case of hijacking

Bug#876959: PTS: Outdated version number shown for o-o-stable

Christoph Biedl wrote... > While I'm aware pts while go away soon-ish, please still provide correct > information for the remaining time. Hopefully this isn't more work than > changing a configuration item and recreating the pages. Checking the sources (thanks for making them

Bug#876959: PTS: Outdated version number shown for o-o-stable

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, as far as I can see, the o-o-stable and (if present) o-o-sec version number shown is the one that was in squeeze, however oldoldstable is now wheezy for quite a while. The link however points to the correct version. This applies for every

Bug#849317: DDPO: NMU shown as "Sponsored/other uploads"

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Hi there, a few days ago, I did a NMU for the pyode packages. Now DDPO shows[1] the upload in the "Sponsored/other uploads", not in "Non-maintainer uploads" where it belongs. Can you please check why this happens? I reckon the reason is the somewhat unusual

Bug#741201: qa.debian.org: Broken "new upstream version" for src:file

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, the pts page at reports for quite some time (weeks at least) "A new upstream version is available: 5.16, you should consider packaging it." However, upstream released 5.17 on Feb 12h ago and that

debian.qa watch information for the ngircd package

Hello, the QA page at shows a watch information for the ngircd package saying "15.mpkg". That information is horribly outdated. Since the ngircd package does not provide a watch file at all, I'm hereby asking you to check