g from the critical list. It is not critical,
> and it is _not_ going to be fixed. I will do nothing further with elvis.
> It is not free, and therefore it is not a part of Debian.
Please downgrade the bug report's severity to `normal' to get it removed
from the l
and
still has his name on packages for longer than a year!
Thanks,
Chris
-- _,, Christian Schwarz
/ o \__ [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
! ___; [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ /
\\\__/ !PGP-fp: 8
ody else able to reproduce this using the *latest* ncurses?
> [ I am not ].
I can reproduce this. I use ncurses3.4 1.9.9g-8 and pine 3.96L-6.
(Is there are newer ncurses?)
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
Do you know [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Debian GNU/L
On Tue, 10 Feb 1998, Raul Miller wrote:
> Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10 Feb 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Package: sam
> > > Version: 4.3-1.1
> > >
> > > /usr/bin/B is not executable (and also need
On 10 Feb 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: sam
> Version: 4.3-1.1
>
> /usr/bin/B is not executable (and also needs a man page).
BTW, what does `B' stand for? I'd consider this as namespace-pollution.
Thanks,
Chris
-- _,, Christian Schwarz
tracking page also lists a info mail from "Rett"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> which appears to be empty)
Until this is resolved, I reopen #16475.
Please specify some reasons when you close a bug next time.
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
Do you know
directory has already been set up but it currently
only holds two packages.)
Any comments are welcome!
If the QA people agree with me I'll forward this to debian-devel.
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Debian
cters. You have to change the console mode/font
in order to get a more readable form.
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
Do you know [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Debian GNU/Linux?[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit PGP-fp: 8F 61 E
8 matches
Mail list logo
