netscape/netscape ?
I take it you downloaded netscape from somewhere.
You'll need to upgrade your system to libc 6.1
The easiest way to do this is to simply upgrade to potato.
Any other way, significantly increases the risk of
breakage on your system.
--
Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECT
7;t uploaded it yet, I'm trying to test more.
I'm in #debian-bugs if you want to reach me.
- brian.
--
Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian/GNU Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.debian.org
LPSG "member"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.lpsg.org
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
ither a) let us maintain debian packages and
redistribute, or .. well yeah that ;) I could do this, unfortunately
I can't sorry :x
It's not even that hard.. just a little if i386/elif ppc magic in
the config, oh well :x
I'm closing this bug.
- brian.
--
Brian Russo <[E
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 01:33:08PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 11:55:43PM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> > > So, I'm going to apply for maintainer status, but it looks like I need an
> > > advocate to verify my application. Any volunteers?
> >
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 10:51:45AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Brian Russo wrote:
> > In ALL cases, discretion should be used. The goal is not to
>
> What do you mean with "discretion should be used"??? I always thought
> Debian was an open pro
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 10:51:45AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Brian Russo wrote:
>
> >...
> > > It's either that or ask for an override, which means that when and if
> > > the package gets adopted you have to ask for a change again,
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 09:57:22AM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >> Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Upload new packages of everything just to change the maintainer to
> > QA ?
> >
> > seems like a waste of resources, especially wi
intainer to
QA ?
seems like a waste of resources, especially with the buildd's on
some arch's behind a lot, adding even a little more load doesnt make
sense.
--
Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian/GNU Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.debian.org
LPSG "member"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.lpsg.org
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
rTaco' Malda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: 22 Feb 2001 10:31:09 EST
From: "Rob 'CmdrTaco' Malda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: asmodem licensing
As I've told every person who has emailed me on the issue, GPL it.
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 03:33:13PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Brian Russo wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:28:19PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've uploaded new packages for asmodem and knews to fix some bu
(cc'd to -qa)
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 05:24:16PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Friday 16 February 2001, at 2 h 12,
> the keyboard of Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > would you have any objection to this package being removed from the
> >
eudopackage "wnpp"
>
> I build a new version of crafty. The package has been sponsored by tony
> mancill
> and he uploaded my files to pool.
>
> Who will be the maintainer of this package from now on ? I'd like to close
> some
go ahead and close them (if th
n
from anyone or similar, I think it's better to simply wait a while,
if not just as a matter of procedure.
- brian.
--
Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian/GNU Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.debian.org
LPSG "member"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.lpsg.org
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
believe
me.
so while this belongs in non-free, i think the upstream will change
the license, so ill just wait a while to upload.
--
Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian/GNU Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.debian.org
LPSG "member"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.lpsg.org
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
o, I'm going to apply for maintainer status, but it looks like I need an
> advocate to verify my application. Any volunteers?
I would certainly welcome people to apply to the NM process, or to
help debian in any other way they like, if it benefits the project,
but maybe it's better
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 10:14:40AM +0100, Roland Mas wrote:
> Brian Russo (2001-02-20 08:35:38 -1000) :
>
> > did you try.. %20 ?
> >
> > perhaps ' will work instead of " ?
>
> Good idea, too bad it does not work.
> --
> Roland Mas
hm, Foo
ou get a smbclient error, wrong share).
>
did you try.. %20 ?
perhaps ' will work instead of " ?
--
Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian/GNU Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.debian.org
LPSG "member"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.lpsg.org
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 07:36:52PM +, Andras Belokosztolszki wrote:
> Package: ical
> Version: 2.2-9
>
> ical depends on: libc6 (>= 2.2.1), libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2, tk8.3 (>= 8.3.0),
> xlibs (>= 4.0.1-11)
>
> but when stared it looks for libtcl8.3.so
>
> >ical: error while loading shared li
is realplayer currently orphaned? it's not listed in wnpp, but the
current maintainer appears to be Debian QA.
--
Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG ID: 54D81666
Debian/GNU OS: http://www.debian.org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
magnus frater spectat te - encrypt whenever possible
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 12:08:30PM -0500, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
> from the secret journal of Brian Russo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > This is not false, I have just been there, and you can download
> > realplayer basic for unix, just like you've been able to for the past
> &g
fine for me, perhaps you'd care to
elaborate as to why it won't work for you?
If you're getting errors about shared libraries, ensure you have xlibs
installed.
--
Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG ID: 54D81666
Debian/GNU OS: www.debian.org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
magnus frater spectat te - encrypt whenever possible
iding X
> librarie
^^ "pseudo" package. you want xlibs
--
Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG ID: 54D81666
Debian/GNU OS: www.debian.org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
magnus frater spectat te - encrypt whenever possible
22 matches
Mail list logo
