On Mon, 2024-07-01 at 08:12 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
[...]
> Jcristau likely tried to fix it, but it wasn't quite enough:
> https://salsa.debian.org/dsa-team/mirror/debian.org/-/commit/ef916448b40e714b6886ca4ad97d65eaffebe6c0
> as it also required some changes in the script too, which I'm not
Package: qa.debian.org
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertag: debsources
Severity: important
Hi,
While waiting for an update run on sor.d.o to finish earlier today (so
I could add a little disk space to /srv) I noticed some errors in the
logs relating to non-free-firmware packages; e.g.
On Sun, 2023-08-06 at 08:22 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> The package data on available via NFS on ullmann.d.o hasn't been
> updated
> since August 4th as reported in #1043103:
>
Unfortunately one of the sync nodes in the mirror network is
unexpectedly offline, starting late on Friday (U
On Mon, 2022-11-14 at 19:39 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> $ wget -nv https://sources.debian.org/
> https://sources.debian.org/:
> 2022-11-14 19:35:05 ERROR 503: Service Unavailable.
Looking at the Apache logs, there seemed to be a large number of errors
associated with one particular /24 over the pas
On Thu, 2021-08-19 at 11:37 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 11:20:47AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > ullmann.debian.org, the host for udd.d.o, filled its PostgreSQL
> > partition overnight. DSA added another 5GB of space, but within a
> > few hours a
Hi,
ullmann.debian.org, the host for udd.d.o, filled its PostgreSQL
partition overnight. DSA added another 5GB of space, but within a few
hours around 3GB of that had already been used.
Looking at the PostgreSQL logs, it appears that auto-cleanup of deleted
records in some of the tables hasn't be
On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 00:14 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 16/06/20 at 21:07 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 16:40 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 02:03:13PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > > Control: severity
On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 16:40 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 02:03:13PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Control: severity -1 serious
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 01:45:27PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:11:39PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Control: reassign -1 qa.debian.org
Control: forcemerge 955268 -1
On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 09:48 +0300, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> Package: tracker.debian.org
> Severity: important
>
> Right now in https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/auto-07p I see:
> -->8--
> Problems while searching for a new upstream
Control: reassign -1 qa.debian.org
On Fri, 2018-08-31 at 20:18 +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> I stumbled at following behaviour of `dcontrol' utility:
As per the manpage, dcontrol is an interface to https://qa.debian.org/c
gi-bin/dcontrol . If you perform the same queries via that script
directly
[Reply-To and M-F-T set to -release]
Hi,
Historically, queue-viewer (the tool used to produce https://release.de
bian.org/proposed-updates/stable.html), has produced XML output and
then used XSLT to generate the HTML output. That process imposes some
limitations and awkwardness, so we'd like to r
Package: tracker.debian.org
Hi,
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/postgresql-9.6 reports both that the
package is "not in any development repository", and that "[t]he package
is severely out of date with respect to the Debian Policy".
It seems silly (and apparently confusing to at least some users)
On 2018-02-05 13:00, shirish शिरीष wrote:
Dear Friends,
I was trying to look at
https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=qalculate but didn't see
anything.
The "package" argument should be a source package. You want
https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=qalculate-gtk
Regards,
Adam
Package: qa.debian.org
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: ddpo
Control: affects -1 + release.debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Hi,
When a package is in the (old)stable-new waiting for review and
acceptance / rejection by the Release Team, this is noted
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: affects -1 + devscripts
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -1 qa.debian.org
Control: retitle -1 should madison.cgi process provides?
Control: reassign -2 ftp.debian.org
Control: retitle -2 consider handling provides as dependencies
On 2017-11-03 6:04, Pira
Control: reassign -1 qa.debian.org
On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 02:19 -0400, annadane wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
www.debian.org isn't the maintainer of pages under qa.debian.org;
reassigning. (And closing, as there is no bug here; see below.)
> The excuses
On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 18:12 +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I was checking the version of libc++ in Debian archive [1] and found that
> package "libc++" failed to migrate to testing in last three years.
>
> While checking for migration excuses, I found that the statement of excuse is
On Sat, 2017-08-12 at 01:14 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Roger Shimizu
> wrote:
> > To whom may concern,
> >
> > I just noticed that buildd status page doesn't show properly as usual,
> > for example:
> > - https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=linux
>
On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 21:02 +0200, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote:
> I've noticed that some packages on the DDPO website are erroneously
> listed with an experimental version.
That depends on your definition of erroneous. The source packages /are/
listed in experimental's Sources file, because:
> He
On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 00:21 +0200, q...@vienna.at wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 11:57:19AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 13:24:33 +0200
> > From: Marcin Kulisz
> > To: 825624-d...@bugs.debian.org
> > User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
> > Rasbian is not me
Control: reassign -1 devscripts
Control: forcemerge 815980 -1
On Sat, 2016-02-27 at 23:07 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi!
>
> Currently, when a package has a newer version available upstream, it
> is not reported at all on DDPO and on tracker.debi
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 21:01 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> The source package commons-httpclient is still shown in
> experimental, although this version was superseded by 3.1-11 in
> unstable two months ago.
fwiw it is still in experimental's Sources file, marked as
"Extra-Source-Only: yes", due
On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 18:38 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> UDD thinks src:eglibc is still in testing/unstable, but it's been
> removed for a while, so it shouldn't show up in the RC bug list:
> https://udd.debian.org/bugs/bugs/?release=jessie_and_sid&patch=ign&merged=ign&done=ign&rc=1
>
> The old
On 2014-09-10 11:17, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Is the PTS playing tricks again?
https://packages.qa.debian.org/g/grub2.html
No, it's not dealing with Extra-Source-Only sources correctly.
oldstable
1.98+20100804-14+squeeze1
stable
1.99-27+deb7u2
testing
2.02~beta2-11
unstable
2
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 00:46 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Quoting Adam D. Barratt (2014-04-20 21:12:49)
> > $ dpkg-architecture -aarmhf -iany-arm && echo matches || echo does not match
> > matches
>
> Thanks. I'm surprised by this behavior as I dont see a se
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 20:11 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Quoting Adam D. Barratt (2014-04-10 22:15:56)
> > Mostly by packages failing to build, or architectures being dropped and
> > the result needing to be cleaned up.
>
> Can this be fixed? Where to look at?
You&
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 10:31 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> $ wget
> http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20140409T00Z/dists/sid/main/binary-amd64/Packages.xz
> $ wget
> http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20140409T00Z/dists/sid/main/source/Sources.xz
> $ zut
On Sat, 2014-01-04 at 20:05 +0100, Bertrand Marc wrote:
> After an upload to stable proposed updates, a new link showed up on DDPO.
>
> But this link showed up in the unstable column instead of the stable one. And
> it links to the new queue [1] instead of the pu queue [2].
I suspect this is a s
On 2014-01-02 17:51, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
Is there a reason why britney doesn't just use the default upload
priority for "new" packages, and not even try to caluclate the
highest
of all uploads in this case? I understand that's the same net result
as the current algorithm (which is to calculat
On 2014-01-02 17:01, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 04:58:12PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Urgencies for new packages are ignored iff they are "higher" than
the default urgency configured in britney. The default was recently
changed to "medium", meanin
On 2014-01-02 16:30, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2014-01-02 16:55 +0100, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
[...]
Too young, only 0 of 5 days old
Ignoring high urgency setting for NEW package
[...]
Packages not in testing are new by definition, and urgency settings
are
ignored for them. So xzgv will hav
Control: reassign -1 www.debian.org
[packages.d.o is maintained by the web team; re-assigning and
full-quoting]
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 22:48 +0200, Mark Caglienzi wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
> I noticed a weird thing in the binary package page of quiter
On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 12:00 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=resiprocate
>
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/713634 is marked as done since 1.8.8 - therefore,
> 1.8.11-4 should be OK for testing but it appears to be stuck
The excuse is entirely correct; this is not
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 16:34 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> packages.qa.debian.org/timeout helps :-)
>
> The package is still in oldstable
Nope.
adsb@franck:~$ dak ls timeout
adsb@franck:~$
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 21:42 +0100, Olivier Berger wrote:
> While working on my webid.debian.net experiment [0], I've noticed that
> the Sources and Packages files sometimes contain entries like :
[...]
> Maintainer: Maintainer: Debian QA Group
For bzr-upload at least, the above is as found in the
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 15:35 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> > Nowhere public yet. I was waiting to see if there were any comments on /
> > objections to the changes, given that for some packages the output could
> >
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 10:52 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> > I have proposed patches ready for the PTS and DDPO (and by extension at
> > least excuses.php) which rewrite the new style links so they target the
> > sam
Hi,
britney recently gained support for properly reporting dependencies on
binary migrations (usually binNMUs) when generating excuses. (See bug
#693068.) At the moment we've fudged the output format so that the file
presented to consumers such as the PTS and DDPO remains consistent, but
would lik
[slightly OT for -qa, but since it started here...]
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 17:01 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I'd probably merge them into one entry as "approve" is (for most
> practical purposes) "unblock for tpu" uploads[1].
[...]
> [1] I am sure that some RT members can give you the full distin
On 31.07.2012 08:29, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 08:18:13AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 31.07.2012 07:35, Andreas Tille wrote:
>The problem I'm now wondering is the excuses page for beast-mcmc:
>
> http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=beast-mcmc
>
&g
On 31.07.2012 07:35, Andreas Tille wrote:
The problem I'm now wondering is the excuses page for beast-mcmc:
http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=beast-mcmc
I have no idea why it is mentioning
beast-doc, beast-examples
for certain architectures even if these packages are arch=all and
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 10:03 +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote:
> I was lookig at one of my packages netlib-java
> (http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/netlib-java.html) and web interface
> shows a "problem" section with content: "The package has not yet
> entered testing even though the 10-day delay is over.
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 00:27 +0200, Christoph G. Baumann wrote:
> My package maelstrom got stuck in unstable. The PTS offers this link:
> http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=maelstrom
>
> which gives "404 Not Found".
That's because the package is in non-free. Which is also the
# On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 09:08 +0200, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
severity 586931 wishlist
reassign 586931 www.debian.org
retitle 586931 packages.d.o: search for files under some specific dir
thanks
> On 22/08/2011 23:12, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > I mean the content search on
> > http://www.debian
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 23:04 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> There seems to be some odd discrepancy in QA pages. An example, visit
> this page with various browsers:
>
> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=cesar.go...@gmail.com
I suspect the discrepancy is that you've set a cookie in a particu
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 23:26 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 22:59:25 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > Could somebody from the release team please give a statement whether
> > there is any chance to inject description_md5 fields into the packages
> > files from Squeeze (and
reassign 652562 qa.debian.org
forcemerge 647708 652562
thanks
On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 16:28 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> rmadison is no longer showing results for lenny when it should:
>
> jona@lupin:~$ rmadison mediawiki
> mediawiki | 1:1.12.0-2lenny5 | lenny-security | source, all
> m
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 22:10 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xdotool.html claims:
>
> # out of date on kfreebsd-amd64: libxdo1 (from 1:1.20100318.2737-1)
> # out of date on kfreebsd-i386: libxdo1 (from 1:1.20100318.2737-1)
It's not wrong:
$ dak ls libxdo1
libxdo1 |
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 10:22 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > (rsync://bugs-mirror.debian.org/bts-versions/indices/binsrc.idx). [You
> > > should also be able to directly rsync the sources file using
> > > r
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 17:29 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> please take a look at [1], specifically the dbus row.
> The website displays incorrect information, like
> a dbus_1.0.2-1+etch3 version in NEW for testing and unstable, or
> a dbus_1.2.1-5+lenny1 for p-u-new in Stable.
>
> Nedless to say, t
Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
As I haven't heard back from the devscripts devel team, I'm
forwarding this here.
fwiw, you do only appear to have waited 24 hours for a response, which isn't
a hugely long time.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
reassign 515801 www.debian.org
thanks
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 20:35 +0200, jaalto wrote:
> While accessing "Copyright" link at
>
> http://packages.debian.org/sid/screen
>
> Gives:
>
> Not Found
>
> The requested URL
> /changelogs/pool/main/s/screen/screen_4.0.3-11/screen.copyright w
Hi,
On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 22:24 +0200, Moritz Naumann wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: minor
>
> The search / redirection
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/common/index.html
> points to may provide unexpected results in some cases.
>
> For example, put a single dot into the search box
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 17:45 +0200, Frank S. Thomas wrote:
[...]
> I think it would also be nice if wnpp-alert could sort packages by popcon
> score so that developers know which packages are "more worth" adopting.
That would be #478835.
Adam
(who really should be packing and not reading mail :-)
On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 17:48 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 08:40:16PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > On my DDPO page[1] there is one missing owned WNPP bug: 429884.
> > I took a quick look at several places but I couldn't find out the source of
> > the problem.
> >
[I suspect most of my fellow devscripts maintainers read -qa, but CCing
the team list just in case]
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 17:50 +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> Hi,
> we have had a little trouble with our sf redirector a while back (i.e. the
> sf mirror was down) and it is really annoying.
> Anyh
Fabian Pietsch wrote:
* "Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Tue, 17 Jun 2008
19:11:21 +0100):
[...]
+# If your package is located on sourceforge, you can avoid its
+# mirror system by using the following format. Note that the
trailing +# \?.+ is required.
+http://sourcefo
Christoph Martin wrote:
If a maintainer has some packages with his email address in different
case in the maintainer field they end up on different pages on
qa.debian.org. See for example:
[...]
Ony should get the same page independent of the case of the maintainer
email.
Probably this is also
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 18:24 +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:07:01AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > I found a while back that this URL redirects to the files page:
> >
> > http://sf.net/projects/foo/files
> >
> > Slightly more readable than the URL you used.
>
> Thanks,
s old
Not considered
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/$ lynx --dump
http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/devscripts.html | egrep -A1 "(Testing
status|Accepted 2.10.20)"
Testing status
* Too young, only 8 of 10 days old
--
* [2008-03-24] [49]Accepted 2.10.20 in unstable (low) (Adam D.
[Let's try that again without accidentally hitting send part way through...]
David Paleino wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il giorno Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:48:40 +0300
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
[...]
The plus sign is URL-speak for a space.
I've
David Paleino wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il giorno Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:48:40 +0300
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
[...]
The plus sign is URL-speak for a space.
I've seen this behaviour only on search engines. Could you point me
to the spec yo
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
# Nearly...
severity 441077 important
merge 441077 427269
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
clone 433408 -1
reassign -1 qa.debian.org
retitle -1 sf.net redirection doesn't always work
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertag -1 webpages
merge -1 427269
thanks
Hi,
Daniel Leidert wrote:
This is probably not a uscan issue. I e.g. also couldn't use such a
watch file for the docbook-xsl package for
reassign 434427 www.debian.org
severity 434427 important
merge 434427 434218
thanks
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 22:00 +0200, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> Changelog and copyright links from the PTS page of all the packages I
> tried are broken and bring
Package: qa.debian.org
Hi,
Recent BTS changes mean that one can no longer use include= or
exclude=, which breaks the two "patches from BTS" links on the PTS.
The links are currently
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=src&data=$package&include=patch&exclude=pending
but need t
reassign 427269 qa.debian.org
thanks
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 22:52 +0200, komar wrote:
> Package: devscripts
> Version: 2.10.4
> Severity: important
>
>
> I try in my debian/watch
> http://sf.net/deplate/deplate-([0-9.]+)\.zip
> and receive
> http://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/deplate/ faile
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 20:27 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 19:12 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > The format - amongst other potentially useful removal related stuff
> > - is
> > documented in http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals (if there's
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 10:13 +0100, Marcus Better wrote:
[...]
> Shouldn't e-mail addresses be case insensitive?
Since you asked ;-) - no, at least for local parts (i.e. the portion
preceding the @). In fact, they MUST NOT (in the BCP14 meaning of that
phrase) be. From RFC2821:
Verbs and argume
reassign 391359 qa.debian.org
thanks
On Friday, October 06, 2006 9:51 AM, Raúl Sánchez Siles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: general
> Severity: wishlist
>
> With aptitude changelog is quite easy to know the latest modifications
> of a package, but it quite often refers to new upstream re
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 16:12 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I propose to remove all packages only in oldstable and unstable, but not
> in testing. These are:
Based on a very quick scan of the list:
[...]
> bookview
Build-Deps on tcl8.0-ja from the tcltk8.0-ja source package, which is
also
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> reopen 341502
> close 341502 1.0final-1
> thanks
>
> * Adam D. Barratt [Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:47:57 -]:
>
>> The only reason the bug wasn't closed is because the bug number was
>> typoed in the changelog; closing it with this message.
>
kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> May I have the qa team's attention to
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=341502
>
> filed on nvu which is like 100 days old. If the original bug reporter
> is right, the issue (I think) is as simple as changing Build-Depends
> line. Even otherwise it
On Tuesday, February 28, 2006 4:07 PM, Justin Pryzby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 03:02:24PM -0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Tuesday, February 28, 2006 1:56 PM, Justin Pryzby
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Package: qa.debian.org
&
On Tuesday, February 28, 2006 1:56 PM, Justin Pryzby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Please consider making the various PTS links point to pdo.debian.net
> until the real PDO works again.
It appears people are ahead of you already :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday, February 09, 2006 9:14 AM, Marc Haber
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 11:05:13PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>> Use http://qa.debian.org/data/ddpo/ddpo_packages, the 2nd and 3rd
>> field in the [foo,bar,baz,.] bit are testing and unstable
>> respective
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 11:20 +, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> The PTS fails to quote get parameters when package names are inserted
> into links. I encountered this problem when I followed the link to the
> BTS on a package having several plus signs in its
On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 18:59 -0500, William Ballard wrote:
> Just curious as to why these packages disappeared from unstable today:
>
> < apps-wrappers
[...]
> < python2.3-hamlib2
You missed a few. Anyway, as far as I can see, all of those packages
were removed as they are no longer built by any s
On Sat, 2004-04-03 at 07:00, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 09:51:31PM +0200, John Ogness wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I am responsible for the dazuko-source package:
> >http://packages.debian.org/unstable/utils/dazuko-source
> >
> >Until now I have sent the packages to Magnus Ekd
"Roxik" wrote, Thursday, February 19, 2004 7:26 PM
[...]
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
> qa does not correct accept '+' char. Please fix this error.
> This is allowed char in MTA.
The problem isn't that `+' is not allowed, it's that `+' has a special
meaning in URLs (it's an encoded
80 matches
Mail list logo
