Hi Lucas,
On Thu, 2023-08-03 at 10:38 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I submitted #1042947 to discuss re-creating a UDD duck importer,
> using the same model as the lintian importer.
>
> @Baptiste: could you take a look? There would be a few changes on the
> duck side that would make it much easie
Hi,
On 03/08/23 at 11:24 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/08/23 at 10:31 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > FYI: I added a usertag for trends.d.n bugs to
> > https://bugs.debian.org/qa.debian.org, as an attempt to publicize my
> > To-Do list. It's not a debian.org service b
Hi,
On 03/08/23 at 10:31 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FYI: I added a usertag for trends.d.n bugs to
> https://bugs.debian.org/qa.debian.org, as an attempt to publicize my
> To-Do list. It's not a debian.org service but it sounds like the most
> logical place to discuss ideas about new g
Package: qa.debian.org
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: trends
Severity: wishlist
>From a private mail:
> include a graph with the number of outstanding multi-arch hints
Package: qa.debian.org
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: trends
Severity: wishlist
>From a private discussion:
It would be useful to publish the raw lintian reports (results of
lintian over all packages for a given lintian version +
date/(source,version) mapping).
A typical use ca
Package: qa.debian.org
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: trends
Severity: wishlist
>From a private mail:
> I thought about it and I think it would be interesting to have the
> Co-maintenance diagram show:
>
> * Team-maintained
> * co-maintained
> * not co-maintained
> * Orphan
Hi all,
I submitted #1042947 to discuss re-creating a UDD duck importer, using
the same model as the lintian importer.
@Baptiste: could you take a look? There would be a few changes on the
duck side that would make it much easier.
Lucas
Hi,
FYI: I added a usertag for trends.d.n bugs to
https://bugs.debian.org/qa.debian.org, as an attempt to publicize my
To-Do list. It's not a debian.org service but it sounds like the most
logical place to discuss ideas about new graphs.
I updated https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/bugs
Pleas
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
duck-as-a-service (duck.debian.net) has been broken for a long time, and
the corresponding UDD importer is broken as well (see #949009, #963887).
In the meantime, duck continued evolving (was rewritten?
Hi,
On 03/04/23 at 17:58 +0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote on 03/04/2023 at 07:21:38+0200:
>
> > Hi DSA,
> >
> > On 23/12/22 at 17:17 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >> > > > I think we should very much not keep it stale, it's been that way way
> >> > > > too long
Hi Patrice,
On 24/06/23 at 13:04 +0200, Patrice Duroux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My starting point is:
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libxmp
> that does not show the new upstream 4.6.0 (since 2023-06-15)
> and UDD says also that upstream_version is 4.5.0 and not 4.6.0
>
> Are the Debian Tracker content
11 matches
Mail list logo
