Bug#806740: tracker.debian.org: Please add AppStream hints panel

2016-05-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi! I created a preliminary patch to solve this issue. (See the attachment) Cheers, Matthias -- I welcome VSRE emails. See http://vsre.info/ From b89dc9c6980b60be139bf82da36c98ce29e9d3f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthias Klumpp Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 21:31:26 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Agg

Processed: your mail

2016-05-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 806740 tracker.debian.org: Please add support for AppStream hints Bug #806740 [tracker.debian.org] tracker.debian.org: Please add DEP-11 metadata issues panel Changed Bug title to 'tracker.debian.org: Please add support for AppStream hin

Re: Package priority issues on qa.debian.org/debcheck.php

2016-05-11 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:47:58PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > - "Binary Package: libprotobuf-lite9v5: Package is optional and has a > > Conflicts on libprotobuf-lite9 which is optional"; the problem is that > > it libprotobuf-lite9v5 not only conflicts, but also _replaces_ > > libprotobuf-lite9,

Re: Package priority issues on qa.debian.org/debcheck.php

2016-05-11 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Iustin Pop , 2016-05-09, 22:29: I'm looking at https://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=protobuf, and both issues I see listed seem false positives: - "Package has a Depends on python:any (>= 2.7.5-5~) which cannot be satisfied on $all_arches"; this is wrong, as python:any i

Re: Package priority issues on qa.debian.org/debcheck.php

2016-05-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Iustin Pop wrote: > Let me know if I should be reporting these as bugs against some package, > or if they are not problems. These are known problems. If anyone would like to help finish up the attached patch to make debcheck use libdpkg-perl for parsing, that woul