On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:47:58PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > - "Binary Package: libprotobuf-lite9v5: Package is optional and has a > > Conflicts on libprotobuf-lite9 which is optional"; the problem is that > > it libprotobuf-lite9v5 not only conflicts, but also _replaces_ > > libprotobuf-lite9, as such the conflicts relation is correct > > libprotobuf-lite9 is no longer built from source, so it should have been > removed semi-automatically by ftp-masters (and then debcheck woudn't have a > reason to complain). Dunno why it didn't happen...
Because there are rdeps.
* source package protobuf version 2.6.1-2 no longer builds
binary package(s): libprotobuf-lite9 libprotobuf9 libprotoc9
on
amd64,arm64,armel,armhf,hurd-i386,i386,kfreebsd-amd64,kfreebsd-i386,mips,mipsel,powerpc,ppc64el,s390x
- suggested command:
dak rm -m "[auto-cruft] NBS (no longer built by protobuf)" -s unstable -a
amd64,arm64,armel,armhf,hurd-i386,i386,kfreebsd-amd64,kfreebsd-i386,mips,mipsel,powerpc,ppc64el,s390x
-p -R -b libprotobuf-lite9 libprotobuf9 libprotoc9
- broken Depends:
node-mapnik: node-mapnik [armel armhf i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386
mipsel]
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
