On 27/05/15 at 22:22 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 06:41:34PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd consider the implementation of status as ENUM more performant than
> > > a plain text. Am I missing something?
> >
> > status is returned by uscan. I did not want to
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 06:41:34PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >
> > I'd consider the implementation of status as ENUM more performant than
> > a plain text. Am I missing something?
>
> status is returned by uscan. I did not want to write in stone the list
> of possible statuses returned by u
On 27/05/15 at 16:33 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 08:51:30AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > If somebody could explain the role of these competing tables I could
> > > decide whether adapting the Blends code or filing a bug report would
> > > be the approp
Hi Lucas,
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 08:51:30AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > If somebody could explain the role of these competing tables I could
> > decide whether adapting the Blends code or filing a bug report would
> > be the appropriate course of actions.
>
> The dehs table was trying to mi
4 matches
Mail list logo
