On 27/05/15 at 22:22 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 06:41:34PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > > > > I'd consider the implementation of status as ENUM more performant than > > > a plain text. Am I missing something? > > > > status is returned by uscan. I did not want to write in stone the list > > of possible statuses returned by uscan. > > Well, there are things written in stone that are more in flux than these > but I have no interest to discuss this here. > > What I'm a bit more concerned about is that the UDD dump has problems > to import exactly this table. I just downloaded a fresh dump and the > log says: > > FEHLER: ungültige Byte-Sequenz für Kodierung „UTF8“: 0x99 > CONTEXT: COPY upstream, Zeile 235 > FEHLER: ungültige Byte-Sequenz für Kodierung „UTF8“: 0xf6 0x6c 0x6c 0xe4 > CONTEXT: COPY upstream_status, Zeile 8680 > > Sorry for German locale - may be this is even the source of the problem??? > It somehow says "invalid byte sequence for UTF encoding". I would > ***really*** love to know how to revert the German postresql locale. :-( > > Anyway I tried to reimport the table but got:
I use scripts/recreate-db to re-import a dump on my dev machine. it works. maybe you are missing a step. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150527205025.ga19...@xanadu.blop.info
