Re: debcheck: "Arch: all" package pulls non-linux package by Recommends

2010-05-30 Thread Russ Allbery
Ricardo Mones writes: > Ralf Treinen wrote: >> How would that change the situation? There still would be only one binary >> package which has Architecture=all, right? > But the Recommends line could be generated empty if the building > architecture is one if the kfreebsd ones where the reco

Re: debcheck: "Arch: all" package pulls non-linux package by Recommends

2010-05-30 Thread Ricardo Mones
On Sun, 30 May 2010 18:22:16 +0200 Ralf Treinen wrote: > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 02:10:35PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > > Re: Ralf Treinen 2010-05-26 <20100526194043.gc2...@free.fr> > > > I am afraid there is currently no way. This would require architecture > > > constraints for relations bet

Re: debcheck: "Arch: all" package pulls non-linux package by Recommends

2010-05-30 Thread Ralf Treinen
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 02:10:35PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Ralf Treinen 2010-05-26 <20100526194043.gc2...@free.fr> > > I am afraid there is currently no way. This would require architecture > > constraints for relations between binary packages like > > > > Recommends: tomoyo-ccstools1.7

Re: retitling old ITA/ITP bugs to O/RFP

2010-05-30 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 30/05/10 at 14:07 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Lucas Nussbaum 2010-05-26 <20100526061354.gb9...@xanadu.blop.info> > > > Maybe just reverting to prior state : if RFP before ITP, then revert to > > > RFP, otherwise, if direct ITP, then close ... > > > > That would indeed be the solution tha

Processed: reassign 583381 to qa.debian.org,security.debian.org

2010-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 583381 qa.debian.org,security.debian.org Bug #583381 [qa.debian.org] http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/openswan.html reports wrong open security issue Bug reassigned from package 'qa.debian.org' to 'qa.debian.org,security.debian.org'. > t

Re: debcheck: "Arch: all" package pulls non-linux package by Recommends

2010-05-30 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Ralf Treinen 2010-05-26 <20100526194043.gc2...@free.fr> > I am afraid there is currently no way. This would require architecture > constraints for relations between binary packages like > > Recommends: tomoyo-ccstools1.7 [! kfreebsd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64] > > Currently (policy 3.8.4), this is n

Re: retitling old ITA/ITP bugs to O/RFP

2010-05-30 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Lucas Nussbaum 2010-05-26 <20100526061354.gb9...@xanadu.blop.info> > > Maybe just reverting to prior state : if RFP before ITP, then revert to > > RFP, otherwise, if direct ITP, then close ... > > That would indeed be the solution that makes the most sense. The problem > is that "prior state"