--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hi Thijs, QA Team,
>
> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I recently stubled over an transitional package in etch that was still in
>> lenny. I could have filed a bug but wondered if there was any
>> structural "scan" being done on p
Hi Thijs, QA Team,
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recently stubled over an transitional package in etch that was still in
> lenny. I could have filed a bug but wondered if there was any
> structural "scan" being done on packages marked as "transitio
On 21/05/08 at 08:56 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Various other considerations that I'd like to add:
> - make it cross-distro from the beginning so that it can contain patches
> from multiple distributions (ie each patch is associated with one or
> more distros)
I really don't think that it
Here is what I wrote down about this patches.d.o idea (sorry, it's not
very well organized, and doesn't include some ideas mentioned in the
-devel@ thread).
patches.debian.org
==
Objective:
Provide simple place to learn about Debian-specific patches, for
upstream, users and ot
On 21/05/08 at 09:03 +0200, sean finney wrote:
> > > additionally, for each patch, when possible provide the following
> > > information:
> > >
> > > - - which version of the package introduced it
> >
> > how are you planning to determine that? why is that important?
>
> how is perhaps left for fu
On Wed, 21 May 2008, sean finney wrote:
> > Various other considerations that I'd like to add:
> > - make it cross-distro from the beginning so that it can contain patches
> > from multiple distributions (ie each patch is associated with one or
> > more distros)
>
> interesting. i don't see a
hiya,
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 08:56:20 am Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> It could possibly be "mole-based" so that it can automatically process any
> new source package that gets uploaded to Debian.
> http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/mole/doc
> (The table "devpackages-src" would be your "TodoSource")
tha
oh, missed some comments at the top:
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 08:56:20 am Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> It really looks like the patches.debian.org discussed on -devel. ;-)
if it's in that "debian patches" discussion, i killfiled the whole thing
because the S:N ratio was getting a little low. but
hiya,
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 07:02:30 am Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> What you propose sounds like adding a lot of information to the PTS
> page. Why did you choose that, instead of a separate website
> (http://patches.d.o)?
after looking over the sources for the pts, i agree that the best place to
On Tue, 20 May 2008, sean finney wrote:
> my proposal is that the current "patches" section on a source package's
> qa package is modified so that the following information is somehow
> provided, where appropriate (depending on structure/format of source
> package naturally).
>
> - - entire "debia
11 matches
Mail list logo
