Re: Membership of qa group and access to qa user

* Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-06 20:39]: > It seems that mario,ana are active new QA contributors who could be > added to the qa group. > > What do other members of the QA Team think? I'm all for adding Mario and Ana. I don't see why everyone should have sudo access, though. -- Marti

Re: Membership of qa group and access to qa user

On Thu, Dec 06, 2007, Luk Claes wrote: > joy,jordi,jello,djpig,anibal,weasel,cjwatson,apollock,pmachard,igenibel igenibel has resigned. -- Mohammed Adnène Trojette -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Membership of qa group and access to qa user

Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 08:39:24PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: >> Currently it seems that tbm,weasel,igenibel,aba,jeroen,myon,herzog have >> sudo access to the qa user. > > I have access to the sudo qa user as well; where did you get this list? Note that I didn't state it

Re: Membership of qa group and access to qa user

On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 08:39:24PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: >It seems that >joy,jordi,jello,djpig,anibal,weasel,cjwatson,apollock,pmachard,igenibel >don't seem to be very active on the QA Team at the moment, though if you >are one of them, please do prove me wrong :-) I'm still active, following de

Re: Membership of qa group and access to qa user

On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 08:39:24PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Currently it seems that tbm,weasel,igenibel,aba,jeroen,myon,herzog have > sudo access to the qa user. I have access to the sudo qa user as well; where did you get this list? Beside this nitpicking, I second the proposal. -- Stefano Za

Re: Membership of qa group and access to qa user

On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 08:48:29PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 06/12/07 at 20:39 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > > What do other members of the QA Team think? > > Adding mario,ana: seconded, of course. > > Giving sudo access to everybody: not sure if it's needed. Those who need > it should have i

Re: Membership of qa group and access to qa user

On 06/12/07 at 20:39 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > What do other members of the QA Team think? Adding mario,ana: seconded, of course. Giving sudo access to everybody: not sure if it's needed. Those who need it should have it. If it's easy to add it for others (ie it takes hours, not days/weeks), then

Re: Membership of qa group and access to qa user

On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 08:39:24PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Hi > > Some people of the qa group seem to have sudo access to the qa user and > others do not. Is there any reason why not all members of the qa group > have this access? > > Maybe we should try to remove the rather inactive members of

Membership of qa group and access to qa user

Hi Some people of the qa group seem to have sudo access to the qa user and others do not. Is there any reason why not all members of the qa group have this access? Maybe we should try to remove the rather inactive members of the qa group, add some new active members and get sudo access for the qa

Re: Summary of the MIA BoF during QA Extremadura 2007

Hi, On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 04:07:15PM +0100, Mario Iseli wrote: > Hello List, > > as discussed I plan to send a mail to debian-devel-announce about the progress > in the MIA-Team. I have created a Draft [0] on the Wiki. And I have also begun > to write some teplates for the ping-mails [1]. > >

Re: Summary of the MIA BoF during QA Extremadura 2007

Hello List, as discussed I plan to send a mail to debian-devel-announce about the progress in the MIA-Team. I have created a Draft [0] on the Wiki. And I have also begun to write some teplates for the ping-mails [1]. Please go ahead changing it, I would like to send the mail Friday evening. Addi