Re: pngcrush and bugs 331068, 338659, 355693, 352177, 330026

2006-03-24 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > I guess this would work if we notice that each > upstream is not that active that releasing one single upstream > triggers many package updates. The package that I have recently prepared of pngc

Re: help

2006-03-24 Thread kamaraju kusumanchi
John Morgan wrote: Hello... I am interested in volunteering some time to help out with debian. I don't have much expirence so to speak in programming or anything but I am a quick learner and have some time to give. I was a system administrator on a linux network a few years ago. I have a workin

Re: pngcrush and bugs 331068, 338659, 355693, 352177, 330026

2006-03-24 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi! On 3/24/06, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > > > The 4 programs are similar, but different. They are small too. > > If there is no chance to unify these algorithms in one single > program using different options (which would IMHO ma

Re: pngcrush and bugs 331068, 338659, 355693, 352177, 330026

2006-03-24 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: The 4 programs are similar, but different. They are small too. If there is no chance to unify these algorithms in one single program using different options (which would IMHO make perfectly sense) I would think about collecting the "needed" ups