Hello, On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > I guess this would work if we notice that each > upstream is not that active that releasing one single upstream > triggers many package updates.
The package that I have recently prepared of pngcrush is based on version 1.6.2 which was released in Jan-Feb 2006 in response to the RC bugs that exist against pngcrush in Debian's BTS. Also as far as I know optipng has been recently fixed up in order to comply with Debian's security requirements so that the package could enter the archive. So I don't think we can take these packages to be inactive. On the other hand it is true that all the authors are active members of the png-mng-implement group of people. So someone could try to mail them to see if they feel that this unification is worthwhile. Regards, Kapil. --
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
