Re: glademm and removing gnome1/c++ libraries

2005-10-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 05:25:10PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Christof Petig wrote: > > There is no reason for glademm to build "depend" on libgnomemm-dev! It > > simply tests libgnomemm for existance to provide a reasonable default > > version. Since these days libgnomemm is rarely used (to

RM: login.app -- RoQA; orphaned for a year, inactive upstream

2005-10-01 Thread Matej Vela
retitle 256681 RM: login.app -- RoQA; orphaned for a year, inactive upstream reassign 256681 ftp.debian.org thanks I think we can remove login.app: * Orphaned for 1 year and 95 days. * 15 outstanding bugs. * gdm, kdm, and xdm provide a superset of its functionality. * No upstream activity

glademm and removing gnome1/c++ libraries

2005-10-01 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Christof Petig wrote: > There is no reason for glademm to build "depend" on libgnomemm-dev! It > simply tests libgnomemm for existance to provide a reasonable default > version. Since these days libgnomemm is rarely used (to say the least) > nobody would notice a missing default version. Thank you!

RM: gkdial -- RoQA; RC-buggy, upstream being rewritten

2005-10-01 Thread Matej Vela
retitle 287992 RM: gkdial -- RoQA; RC-buggy, upstream being rewritten reassign 287992 ftp.debian.org thanks On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 17:04:54 +0200, Matej Vela wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 01:15:20PM -0300, Guilherme de S. Pastore wrote: >> Em Seg, 2005-08-15 ??s 18:06 +0200, Matej Vela escreve

RM: chastity-list -- RoQA; abandoned upstream, very outdated

2005-10-01 Thread Matej Vela
retitle 321594 RM: chastity-list -- RoQA; abandoned upstream, very outdated reassign 321594 ftp.debian.org thanks I think we can remove chastity-list: * Orphaned for 56 days. * This list of adult/gambling/etc. domains hasn't been updated from September 2002, which makes it pretty much use

RM: cantus -- RoQA; out of date, better alternatives

2005-10-01 Thread Matej Vela
retitle 287985 RM: cantus -- RoQA; out of date, better alternatives reassign 287985 ftp.debian.org thanks I think we can remove cantus: * Orphaned for 272 days. * 4 bugs total. * Never part of a stable release. * There are better alternatives -- vorlon suggests quodlibet:

Re: Bug#280691: Removing efax

2005-10-01 Thread Vassilii Khachaturov
> It doesn't work with mgetty-fax or HylaFAX [1]? Or did you mean that > those are not standalone and easy-to-use? both. mgetty.info explains how cls2 is the only way to go and how cls1 will never be supported. I remember having some problem with hylafax, too, but it was before mgetty, and thus n

Re: Bug#280691: Removing efax

2005-10-01 Thread Matej Vela
Vassilii Khachaturov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please do not remove efax. efax/efax-gtk > is the only normal and easy to use standalone > desktop machine program that also works with cheap class 1 > linmodems like the one I have (a pct789). It doesn't work with mgetty-fax or HylaFAX [1]? Or

Re: Bug#280691: Removing efax

2005-10-01 Thread Vassilii Khachaturov
> an upstream release in 5 years [1], it chokes on files produced by > dvi2fax [2], and we have better maintained alternatives [3] [4]. > > [1] > [2] > [3] > [4]

Removing efax

2005-10-01 Thread Matej Vela
Hi, On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 20:13:59 +0200, Matej Vela wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 10:28:23 +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 13:12:23 +0200, Matej Vela wrote: > > > Do you still intend to adopt efax? (This is just a ping, I'm not > > > interested in adopting it myself.) > > >