Hi,
just a quick note: this bug is still present. I run into it at
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libh/libhttp-server-simple-perl.html
Cheers,
--
Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:46:37PM -0500, Sam Hart wrote:
> Well, I can't help on the font issues (I have contacted Jesse Andrews
> and some of the others who worked on the project after me to see if they
> can point me to where they came from... most likely external
> contributors)... however, for
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 19:50 +0200, Florian Ernst wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 12:36:18PM -0500, Sam Hart wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 18:23 +0200, Florian Ernst wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 10:37:01AM -0500, Sam Hart wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > Nearly every graphic, sound and anima
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Sam Hart wrote:
Nearly every graphic, sound and animation was something that I created
except for a few images which were pulled from the Copyright Free Photo
Archive here: http://gimp-savvy.com/PHOTO-ARCHIVE/index.html
Well, if you are looking for photos that make a nice
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 18:23 +0200, Florian Ernst wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 10:37:01AM -0500, Sam Hart wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > [...]
> > Nearly every graphic, sound and animation was something that I created
> > except for a few images which were pulled from the Copyright Free Photo
> > Arc
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 12:36:18PM -0500, Sam Hart wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 18:23 +0200, Florian Ernst wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 10:37:01AM -0500, Sam Hart wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > Nearly every graphic, sound and animation was something that I created
> > > except for a few images wh
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 06:23:01PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Justin Pryzby in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Oddly, when I look up [EMAIL PROTECTED] (on
> > > http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]), it thinks
> > > his name is Takashi Okamoto. Something is broken here.
> > > --
> > Do y
On 9/29/05, Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Re: Andreas Tille in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >1266 days: tuxtype (0 waiting, new pkg, has RC bugs) [Rune B. Broberg]
> > > Copyright issues (see bug 218908). Jeroen wrote "let's see if someone
> > > interested jumps in, otherwise, removal see
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 17:57 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Andreas Tille in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >1266 days: tuxtype (0 waiting, new pkg, has RC bugs) [Rune B. Broberg]
> > > Copyright issues (see bug 218908). Jeroen wrote "let's see if someone
> > > interested jumps in, otherwise, removal
Hello *,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 10:37:01AM -0500, Sam Hart wrote:
> >> 1266 days: tuxtype (0 waiting, new pkg, has RC bugs) [Rune B. Broberg]
> >> Copyright issues (see bug 218908). Jeroen wrote "let's see if someone
> >> interested jumps in, otherwise, removal seems to be the best option to
Re: Justin Pryzby in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Oddly, when I look up [EMAIL PROTECTED] (on
> > http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]), it thinks
> > his name is Takashi Okamoto. Something is broken here.
> > --
> Do you want to file a bug or should I?
That's the Maintainer field of aspectj a
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 03:05:08AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> These packages are candidates for removal
> 1671 days: scandetd (0 waiting, new pkg, has RC bugs) [Bradley Alexander]
> Potential removal bug already filed by Marc Brockschmidt more than 7 days
> ago. Is it OK to reassign it
Re: Andreas Tille in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >1266 days: tuxtype (0 waiting, new pkg, has RC bugs) [Rune B. Broberg]
> > Copyright issues (see bug 218908). Jeroen wrote "let's see if someone
> > interested jumps in, otherwise, removal seems to be the best option to
> > me."
> > -- on 21 June. Some
>On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 10:15 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> 1266 days: tuxtype (0 waiting, new pkg, has RC bugs) [Rune B. Broberg]
>> Copyright issues (see bug 218908). Jeroen wrote "let's see if someone
>> interested jumps in, otherwise, removal seems to be the best option to me."
>> -- on 21
Russ Allbery writes:
> Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > 1340 days: trn (0 waiting, new pkg, has RC bugs) [Matthew Vernon]
> > 49 popcon installs of which 32 'old', 1 'recent', 1 'nofiles'
> >Non-free. Non-free trn4 (provides trn) is substantially better
> > maintai
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
These packages are candidates for removal by virtue of having
been sitting in unstable without being in 'testing' for very long periods.
It has a few false positives for packages which were kicked out of testing
recently, but they are pretty good cand
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1340 days: trn (0 waiting, new pkg, has RC bugs) [Matthew Vernon]
> 49 popcon installs of which 32 'old', 1 'recent', 1 'nofiles'
>Non-free. Non-free trn4 (provides trn) is substantially better maintained.
>Maintainer should probably be wa
These packages are candidates for removal by virtue of having
been sitting in unstable without being in 'testing' for very long periods.
It has a few false positives for packages which were kicked out of testing
recently, but they are pretty good candidates too.
This is based on http://bjorn.haxx.
18 matches
Mail list logo
