On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 03:05:08AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > These packages are candidates for removal
> 1671 days: scandetd (0 waiting, new pkg, has RC bugs) [Bradley Alexander] > Potential removal bug already filed by Marc Brockschmidt more than 7 days > ago. Is it OK to reassign it to ftp.debian.org now? Huh. I have this installed, and it does useful things for me. I'd be willing to maintain this, if its available for the taking, even to the point of becoming upstream; looks like a simple piece of code (single 1000 line source file). If anyone knows of a (technical) reason I shouldn't do this .. step forwards now. Otherwise, has anyone been in contact with Bradley? > -- > This raised the issue of scm, which is "maintained" by James LewisMoss > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, and is quite seriously suffering from FTBFS bugs. > scm is a good candidate for a forced orphaning -- perhaps someone could file > a 7-day-warning bug? > > Oddly, when I look up [EMAIL PROTECTED] (on > http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]), it thinks > his name is Takashi Okamoto. Something is broken here. > -- Do you want to file a bug or should I? > 1057 days: chdrv (0 waiting, new pkg, has RC bugs) [Anthony Fok] > 8 popcon users, 7 old. > Good old MIA Anthony Fok. 3-year-old grave bug. Should be removed. Has anyone been in contact with Anthony? -- Clear skies, Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
