Re: old RFPs (was: RFP+ITP for the same package)

2005-02-28 Thread Alexander Schmehl
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050301 10:19]: > If the upstream is dead, I'd close the RFP saying this. Will take a look at that again, when I'm back. Yours sincerely, Alexander -- http://learn.to/quote/ http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html signature.asc Description

Re: old RFPs (was: RFP+ITP for the same package)

2005-02-28 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-28 10:10]: > BTW: I recently take a look at the WNPP bugs, and found many old RFPs. > Some are some years old, and I wonder what should be done with them. > Some of them are retitled ITPs, some even with a dead upstream. Old ITPs are sometimes ping

Re: State of dhcp3

2005-02-28 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 08:58:48PM +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote: >If I'm adding myself as an uploader, do I use an NMU version number No. >or a normal maintainer upload version number? Yes. >regards > >Andrew >-- >linux.conf.au 2005 - http://linux.conf.au/ - Birthplace of Tux >April 18th t

Re: State of dhcp3

2005-02-28 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 09:31:44AM -0500, Eloy A. Paris wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 06:14:40PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 01:10:30PM +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > > > > There's a few reasonably annoying bugs in dhcp3-client, that have > > > been open for a f