On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 01:02:10PM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
> > Does Debian have a specific policy about this? 'cause I don't
> > think either (s)he or his/her type replacements are nearly as
> > aesthetic...
> Well I tend to use "they" / "their" myself, which is in fairly common
> usage. e.g.:
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Ben Burton wrote:
> It's not much of a justification -- it basically amounts to "my way is
> right" followed by a personal insult to anyone who disagrees.
>
> Switching to gender-neutral language is not exactly an outrageous ask.
> Official, technical and scientific documents m
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 11:49:32AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From #194771:
>
> >>> To be honest gtk-menu is pretty much redundant now.
> >>>
> >>> I packaged it really for use with ipaqs etc... But now most handheld
> >>> users are using matchbox which has a decent menu.
> >>>
> Does Debian have a specific policy about this? 'cause I don't
> think either (s)he or his/her type replacements are nearly as
> aesthetic...
Well I tend to use "they" / "their" myself, which is in fairly common
usage. e.g.:
If a student falls asleep in class, they will probably absorb the
Following up as requested in recent discussion in debian-devel:
There isn't a lot *wrong* with the current weblint package (no RC bugs or
the like). However, it only supports HTML 4, there is no upstream at all
(upstream cannot be contacted and their domain has expired), there's no
active develop
Hi,
From #194771:
>>> To be honest gtk-menu is pretty much redundant now.
>>>
>>> I packaged it really for use with ipaqs etc... But now most handheld
>>> users are using matchbox which has a decent menu.
>>>
>>> I'm personally not using gtk-menu at all now - and have been pondering
>>> getting
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 07:57:13PM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> (Replying to d-devel as per m-f-t and d-qa as per request).
>
> Thanks for your work with the RFH tag; this is a great idea.
>
> One request though: Could you please change the the tag description to
> use gender-neutral language?
Title: Email Message
I am becoming angry, because tex4ht has some bugs that are fixed in
upstream sources, but not in Debian-package.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=234678
Then I heard about this:
http://www.nl.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-beyond-pkging.en.html#s-mia-qa
Well, let's see
Your message dated Mon, 2 Aug 2004 19:55:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line New popcon display
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Your message dated Mon, 2 Aug 2004 15:12:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#262940: Base system bugs listing incomplete
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 01:42:10PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Priority: normal
> Version: N/A; reported August 2nd 2004
>
> If you take a look at http://bugs.qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/base.cgi?full=yes
> you will see that only base packages up to 'fileutil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 261990
Bug#261990: developer.php: separately hide Experimental version
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thank
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
Your message dated Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:58:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line new developer.php version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:54:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line synchronization between dehs and developer.php
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:50:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line new developer.php
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:51:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line new developer.php
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Package: qa.debian.org
Priority: normal
Version: N/A; reported August 2nd 2004
The lintian report at
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=jfs%40computer.org&comaint=yes
points to
http://lintian.debian.org/reports/mJavier_Fernandez-Sanguino_Pen_a.html
when it should instead point to
http://lint
Package: qa.debian.org
Priority: normal
Version: N/A; reported August 2nd 2004
Taking a look at
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=jfs%40computer.org&comaint=yes
there is a small issue:
"All bugs related to <[EMAIL PROTECTED];>" points to
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?main
Package: qa.debian.org
Priority: normal
Version: N/A; reported August 2nd 2004
If you take a look at http://bugs.qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/base.cgi?full=yes
you will see that only base packages up to 'fileutils'. Probably the script
taht generates that is messed up and breaks there..
Regards
Javie
(Replying to d-devel as per m-f-t and d-qa as per request).
Thanks for your work with the RFH tag; this is a great idea.
One request though: Could you please change the the tag description to
use gender-neutral language? Currently http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
has "he" and "his" scattered
Le lundi 2 Août 2004 11:19, Peter Palfrader a écrit :
> > It would be great if I could find a way to deal with revoked/expired
> > keys For example with my previous gpg key (revoked) 0x9D735B4F
> > http://keyserver.fabbione.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x9D735B4F&opt
> >ions=mr I can't find such inf
On Mon, 02 Aug 2004, Igor Genibel wrote:
> Le samedi 31 Juillet 2004 00:07, Peter Palfrader a écrit :
> > Hi everyone,
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> > | General information: (collapse) GPG key id: [2]D097A261
> >
> >
> >
> > | [3]Non-fixed bugs
Le samedi 31 Juillet 2004 00:07, Peter Palfrader a écrit :
> Hi everyone,
Hi Peter,
> | General information: (collapse) GPG key id: [2]D097A261
>
>
>
> | [3]Non-fixed bugs, most recent first
>
> This is not my keyid, something appare
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#115368: RFP: xmlrpclib -- Python implementation of the XML-RPC protocol,
which was filed against the wnpp package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Seo Sanghyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation is attached belo
25 matches
Mail list logo
