Your message dated Mon, 2 Aug 2004 15:12:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#262940: Base system bugs listing incomplete
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2004 11:42:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 02 04:42:13 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tornado.dat.etsit.upm.es (dat.etsit.upm.es) [138.100.17.73] 
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BrbCm-000817-00; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 04:42:12 -0700
Received: (qmail 20996 invoked by uid 1013); 2 Aug 2004 11:42:10 -0000
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 13:42:10 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Base system bugs listing incomplete
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: qa.debian.org
Priority: normal
Version: N/A; reported August 2nd 2004

If you take a look at http://bugs.qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/base.cgi?full=yes 
you will see that only base packages up to 'fileutils'. Probably the script 
taht generates that is messed up and breaks there..

Regards

Javier

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 262940-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2004 14:12:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 02 07:12:38 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BrdYM-000534-00; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 07:12:38 -0700
Received: from [192.168.124.112] (helo=riva.lab.dotat.at)
        by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp
        id 1BrdYK-0000iO-00; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 15:12:36 +0100
Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1BrdYJ-00071l-00; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 15:12:35 +0100
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 15:12:35 +0100
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#262940: Base system bugs listing incomplete
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 01:42:10PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Priority: normal
> Version: N/A; reported August 2nd 2004
> 
> If you take a look at http://bugs.qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/base.cgi?full=yes 
> you will see that only base packages up to 'fileutils'. Probably the script 
> taht generates that is messed up and breaks there..

I've restored my changes working around this problem (which appears to
be an Apache bug).

Frank, please note that /org/bugs.qa.debian.org on merkel contains local
diffs from CVS pending me being sure enough about them to check them in.
Please do not simply replace files there with files from CVS.

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to