Suggest removing logout-button from unstable

2004-03-19 Thread Nathanael Nerode
See #236055. Oh, and the minor bugs too, but mostly #236055. Also, the policy version on this package is too damn old (2.5.0). The maintainer suggested removing it, but apparently couldn't be bothered to actually ask to have it removed. You may remember him from the 'animals' fiasco. -- Make

Re: Marcelo Magallon inactive ?

2004-03-19 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 07:20:26PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > I would point out that while wmaker has 3 maintainers (John H. Robinson, > IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin F. Krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) , no > upload was performed since september. > I followed up a bug about current upstream v

Re: Marcelo Magallon inactive ?

2004-03-19 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-19 19:20]: > I would point out that while wmaker has 3 maintainers (John H. Robinson, > IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin F. Krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) , no > upload was performed since september. John (jaqque) is sort of inactive as well, but Martin sho

Re: Marcelo Magallon inactive ?

2004-03-19 Thread Bill Allombert
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 05:31:30PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-19 17:41]: > > It looks like Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > is mostly inactive currently. He did not make any upload since > > September 2003. 5 packages have been NMUed si

Re: Marcelo Magallon inactive ?

2004-03-19 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-19 17:41]: > It looks like Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > is mostly inactive currently. He did not make any upload since > September 2003. 5 packages have been NMUed since that time. Yes, see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/debian-

Please remove xml-commons-resolver

2004-03-19 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Package: ftp.debian.org Please remove xml-commons-resolver * Mark Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-18 13:09]: > BTW, I noticed that the java group has _also_ packaged Norm Walsh's > resolver classes. I packaged the 1.0 version under > xml-commons-resolver, which should now be removed from the

Re: Easily-fixed outstanding RC bugs

2004-03-19 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Just trawling through the BugScan output, I found a few easy-to-fix RC bugs >> that >> have had patches sitting around for a while. So, here goes: >> >> 233145: d

Re: Easily-fixed outstanding RC bugs

2004-03-19 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-19 15:59]: >> As you are the maintainer, maybe it's better if you file a bug against >> ftp.debian.org asking for xml-commons-resolver to be removed. > > I ca

Marcelo Magallon inactive ?

2004-03-19 Thread Bill Allombert
Hello Debian QA, It looks like Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is mostly inactive currently. He did not make any upload since September 2003. 5 packages have been NMUed since that time. The problem is that Marcelo maintains quite a large number of packages, and without a responsive mainta

Re: Easily-fixed outstanding RC bugs

2004-03-19 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-19 15:59]: > > BTW, I noticed that the java group has _also_ packaged Norm Walsh's > > resolver > > classes. I packaged the 1.0 version under xml-commons-resolver, which > > should > > now be removed from the archive. I'll do whatever bug-closing yo

Is Benoit Joly MIA?

2004-03-19 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi QA, Hi Benoit, Benoit is the maintainer of liblog4j package which is wildly used by the java packages to build and to run. liblog4j is in contrib, so it prevents a lot of java packages to go in main. I already file a bug 123 days ago to ask Benoit

Re: Easily-fixed outstanding RC bugs

2004-03-19 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 11:35:16PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: >> Mark, are you busy at the moment? Do you mind if I do NMU these >> packages? > > Not at all. Please do NMU, in fact. And yes, you're right,

Re: BSP bugs - some proposed targets

2004-03-19 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 10:47:28AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > alioth still uses it, so perhaps they should migrate first? The > maintainer has also > switched to the FreeBSD version of it which he claims is more actively > maintained. I guess you have fight it out with him. Yeah? Good grie

Re: BSP bugs - some proposed targets

2004-03-19 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 04:02:28PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 01:25:10AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I was going through the RC bug list and compiled a little set of > > packages that seem to deserve a NMU. > > > > You can find it at http://people.d

Re: BSP bugs - some proposed targets

2004-03-19 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 04:02:28PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 01:25:10AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I was going through the RC bug list and compiled a little set of > > packages that seem to deserve a NMU. > > > > You can find it at http://people.

Re: BSP bugs - some proposed targets

2004-03-19 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 01:25:10AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > Hi. > > I was going through the RC bug list and compiled a little set of > packages that seem to deserve a NMU. > > You can find it at http://people.debian.org/~djpig/bsp.html I thought cvsweb had been deprecated in favour of v