Re: Removal of gtkgraph ?

2004-02-02 Thread Martin Michlmayr
reassign 202228 ftp.debian.org retitle 202228 Please remove gtkgraph thanks * tony mancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-02 12:36]: > Yes I agree that it should be removed immediately, particularly in light > of the fact that it can produce erroneous output merely depending upon > how the input is

Re: Removal of gtkgraph ?

2004-02-02 Thread tony mancill
Yes I agree that it should be removed immediately, particularly in light of the fact that it can produce erroneous output merely depending upon how the input is grouped. I would take a stab at fixing the bugs, but I don't know lex, and tend to agree with Aaron about better alternatives being avail

Re: cdtool

2004-02-02 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 07:22:51PM +0100, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > One of my sponsors asked me to do that some time ago. > I thought it's a requirement. :) The reason is practical: sometimes sponsoree 'disappears' misteriously :) Having an easy tracking of who could contact him/her and followed th

Re: cdtool

2004-02-02 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Il lun, 2004-02-02 alle 19:08, Graham Wilson ha scritto: > On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 07:00:07PM +0100, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > > It's usually a good idea to put the name and email of the sponsor in the > > changelog. > > > > Please do it next time. > > I don't think that is necessary unless the pa

Re: cdtool

2004-02-02 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 07:00:07PM +0100, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > Il lun, 2004-02-02 alle 18:40, Max Vozeler ha scritto: > > On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 08:53:30PM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote: > > > A diff with my changes against 2.1.5-4.1 is attached. I would need > > > someone to sponsor this upload.. >

Re: cdtool

2004-02-02 Thread Graham Wilson
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 07:00:07PM +0100, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > Il lun, 2004-02-02 alle 18:40, Max Vozeler ha scritto: > > Thanks Graham Wilson for uploading the new package. > > It's usually a good idea to put the name and email of the sponsor in the > changelog. > > Please do it next time. I

Re: cdtool

2004-02-02 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Il lun, 2004-02-02 alle 18:40, Max Vozeler ha scritto: > On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 08:53:30PM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote: > > A diff with my changes against 2.1.5-4.1 is attached. I would need > > someone to sponsor this upload.. > > Thanks Graham Wilson for uploading the new package. It's usually a g

Re: Removal of gtkgraph ?

2004-02-02 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Laurent Fousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-28 11:37]: > While looking at the bugs of gtkgraph I wondered if a newer upstream > version was available. However: > > - [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounces, > - Aaron Lehman told me the project is dead upstream and he thinks >there are better alternative

Re: cdtool

2004-02-02 Thread Max Vozeler
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 08:53:30PM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote: > A diff with my changes against 2.1.5-4.1 is attached. I would need > someone to sponsor this upload.. Thanks Graham Wilson for uploading the new package. Cheers Max -- Max Vozeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://hinterhof.net/~

Re: Consider removing iraf from testing

2004-02-02 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 05:30:00PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-30 17:47]: > > Is it worth keeping iraf-ibin? It only suggests iraf, but I thought I'd > > ask. > > And iraf-noaobin? See my post earlier in this thread. # This does indeed seem to be

Re: Othmar Pasteka MIA?

2004-02-02 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-29 22:41]: > Look at bug 209338 on yank. Maintainer has not commented. Of his > other packages, dcd is fine, modlogan is in NMU versions since > September, and trueprint has two year-old bugs. He's a bit busy. Frank Lichtenheld asked about this o

Re: Consider removing iraf from testing

2004-02-02 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-30 17:47]: > > It needs to be repackaged from scratch at this point, and the person > > who I was working with on it hasn't sent me anything about it for > > quite some time. I don't have time right now to do a complete > > rebuild. I'll resubmit it in

Re: pbbuttonsd severity

2004-02-02 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-30 04:36]: > Martin, this may need your attention. I contacted him about a week ago and he said he'd prepare new packages. Since then, he posted to -powerpc asking for people to test the new version. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Remove pyne

2004-02-02 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Emanuele Rocca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-29 12:03]: > * orphaned 99 days ago > * doesn't build (#221085) nor run (#223684) > * ex maintainer agree on its removal > * a lot of other packages with the same features Thanks, I've requested its removal. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]