Yes I agree that it should be removed immediately, particularly in light of the fact that it can produce erroneous output merely depending upon how the input is grouped. I would take a stab at fixing the bugs, but I don't know lex, and tend to agree with Aaron about better alternatives being available.
Cheers,
tony
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 05:41:35PM +0000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Laurent Fousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-28 11:37]:
> > While looking at the bugs of gtkgraph I wondered if a newer upstream
> > version was available. However:
> >
> > - [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounces,
> > - Aaron Lehman told me the project is dead upstream and he thinks
> > there are better alternatives anyway.
> > - the package has reached the "orphaned for 6 months" criteria.
> > - bugs #230009 and #103239 are really bad for a scientific calculator
> > emulation.
>
> Tony, this sounds like a reasonable suggestion; what do you think?
>
> --
> Martin Michlmayr
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Q: How many Bell Labs Vice Presidents does it take to change a light bulb?
A: That's proprietary information. Answer available from AT&T on payment
of license fee (binary only).
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
