On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 04:24:39PM +0100, Pierre Machard wrote:
> severity 229108 normal
> severity 229109 normal
> merge 229108 229109
> retitle 229109 New upstream version 0.5.8 available
> retitle 229108 New upstream version 0.5.8 available
> severity 228119 normal
> merge 229108 228119
>
> tha
==> remove iraf/2.11.3-2
#223543: FTBFS -- requires a bootstrap process which doesn't autobuild
#223532: Major FHS violation -- files under /usr/iraf
#218793: ships /usr/bin/xpp, conflicting with xpp package (with no Conflicts,
even).
Oh, it also has installation errors (#223528), dangling symlin
Look at bug 209338 on yank. Maintainer has not commented.
Of his other packages, dcd is fine, modlogan is in NMU versions since September,
and trueprint has two year-old bugs.
He's not on vacation.
--
Nathanael Nerode
http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 05:57:10PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi Martin!
> You wrote:
> > It fails to build from source here (on mips):
> [...]
> > 16:37 so what's the fix?
> > 16:37 you'd need to upgrade it to libtool 1.5
> How?
libtoolize? (Which wil fail miserably if the program is usin
Hi Martin!
You wrote:
> It fails to build from source here (on mips):
[...]
> 16:37 so what's the fix?
> 16:37 you'd need to upgrade it to libtool 1.5
How?
--
Kind regards,
++
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7
* Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-27 18:42]:
> > Could someone QA upload a new upstream of pfe? Then we could get rid
> > of the build-depends on xm-tool and at least remove this (orphaned)
> > package.
>
> I'm on it.
It fails to build from source here (on mips):
ar cru .libs/testmod
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 229868 qa.debian.org
Bug#229868: Please remove mindi and mondo
Bug reassigned from package `ftp.debian.org' to `qa.debian.org'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
* Francesco P. Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-29 16:17]:
> > > It could be that mindi does not really need to depend on mindi-kernel
> >
> > Are you volunteering to check whether this is the case? (Plus, are you
> > going to adopt mindi and mondo since their maintainer seem inactive.)
>
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 02:01:58PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-27 10:40]:
> > It could be that mindi does not really need to depend on mindi-kernel
> > but only on a kernel which has certain features (which an ordinary
> > kernel-image-* probably ha
Hi,
* orphaned 99 days ago
* doesn't build (#221085) nor run (#223684)
* ex maintainer agree on its removal
* a lot of other packages with the same features
--
Emanuele Rocca - 1024D/EAF19B60
10 matches
Mail list logo