Re: building in a chroot

* Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-13 19:36]: > This mail, > > talks about one method of making a chroot. Is there something more > formal? http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-tips.en.html#s-chroot -- Martin M

building in a chroot

I think that I need to build in a chroot environment in order to test-build a changed I've made to a package. I'd do this on my dev machine, but the problem occurs on ia64, only. This mail, talks about one method of making a chro

Chasing #203336, gcvs compile problem in ia64

Please let me know if someone else is working on it.

Re: Processed: Patch

On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 02:33:27PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > tags 197593 + patch > Bug#197593: gtkglareamm: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on libglu-dev > There were no tags set. > Tags added: patch Marc, could you make an NMU

Re: Helping busy maintainers

#189751: lanoche: depends on non-existent xviddetect Package: lanoche; Severity: serious; Reported by: Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 177 days old. I've looked into this one a bit. The program displays an HTML report of the hardware on a computer. I wonder if this is a good candid

Re: Helping busy maintainers

On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 12:10:04AM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Stijn de Bekker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > RC bug with patch, also new upstream available. > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED] I have made an NMU of this package that fixes the RC bug (#210558). -- gram signat

Bug#214205: New Critical Update

-- Virus Warning Message (on mtvirus) Found virus WORM_SWEN.A in file Q557846.exe The uncleanable file is deleted. -   Microsoft   All Products |  Support |  Search |  Microsoft.com Guide  Microsoft Home

Bug#214205: AntiVir ALARM [Email von: "Net Service" ]

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * AntiVir ALARM! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * AntiVir hat folgendes in einer Mail, die an Sie gerichtet war, gefunden: Worm/Gibe.C.1 virus Die E-Mail wurde nicht ausgeliefert und auf dem Server isoliert. Mail-Info: --8<-- Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From

Bug#214205: AntiVir ALARM [Email von: "Microsoft Corporation Internet Security Division" ]

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * AntiVir ALARM! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * AntiVir hat folgendes in einer Mail, die an Sie gerichtet war, gefunden: Worm/Gibe.C.1 virus Die E-Mail wurde nicht ausgeliefert und auf dem Server isoliert. Mail-Info: --8<-- Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From

Bug#120556 submitter address changed (ITP: dmake at long last)

The submitter address recorded for your Bug report #120556: ITP: dmake -- make utility used to build OpenOffice.org has been changed. The new submitter address for this report is Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. This change was made by Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. If it was incorrect, please

Re: Helping busy maintainers

* tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-13 14:54]: > Grzegorz Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > pimppa has 1 RC bug (please NMU), php4-interbase has 3 -- it has to > be investigated whether this package shold be removed. Please do > not touch sab

Bug#214205: marked as done (qa.debian.org/debcheck: Please don't include contrib/non-free)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Oct 2003 14:50:39 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Re: Results of a trawl for old, ignored RC bugs

* Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-12 18:59]: > request-tracker: #191165 -- command line utilities don't work > Already orphaned and maintained by QA. Not in 'stable'. I suggest > total removal unless some other package depends on it. (I can't > seem to figure out whether any do