Your message dated Mon, 13 Oct 2003 14:50:39 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2003 14:14:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 05 09:14:16 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A69eK-0002eR-00; Sun, 05 Oct 2003 09:14:16 -0500
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 35DD826B8F; Sun, 5 Oct 2003 16:14:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5CEC2100DE; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 00:13:49 +1000 (EST)
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 00:13:49 +1000
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: qa.debian.org/debcheck: Please don't include contrib/non-free
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.32
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_03
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_03
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
I just checked for broken dependencies and noticed a large number of
Java packages... they are in contrib, however, which permits
dependencies on packages not in Debian. I think contrib and non-free
should not be included in debcheck because of this policy.
For your reference, the package I checked was
http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=sid&package=libcommons%2ddbcp%2djava
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux deprecation 2.4.22-1-686 #4 Sun Sep 28 13:27:15 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 214205-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2003 04:51:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 12 23:51:04 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A8uff-00016Z-00; Sun, 12 Oct 2003 23:51:03 -0500
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 5ABCC26B27; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 06:51:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6584CFE99; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 14:50:39 +1000 (EST)
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 14:50:39 +1000
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: done
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0
tests=none
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
weasel has split it into all and main now.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
