Re: Cleaning up ITA

2003-09-18 Thread Andreas Barth
* Frank Lichtenheld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030918 19:35]: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:12:58PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 06:08:24PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > > Hmm, is the BTS database openly available? > > No, sorry. > Ok. One more reason to get through NM :)

Re: Cleaning up ITA

2003-09-18 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:12:58PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 06:08:24PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:49:48PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > > > It needs the Packages files from unstable and the BTS database. > > > > Hmm, is the BTS databa

Bug#211228: marked as done (developer.php: please supply repeatmerged=no)

2003-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 Sep 2003 18:27:33 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Close this has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reope

Re: Cleaning up ITA

2003-09-18 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 06:08:24PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:49:48PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > > It needs the Packages files from unstable and the BTS database. > > Hmm, is the BTS database openly available? No, sorry. -- Colin Watson

Re: Cleaning up ITA

2003-09-18 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:49:48PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > You wrote: > > > Which package are we talking about? > > > All. I offered to go through all ITAs, remove done ones, ask for status... > > Since this will take me some hours, I asked on debian-qa first > > if someone is doing this alr

Re: Cleaning up ITA

2003-09-18 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Frank! You wrote: > > > You'd have to ask bas. CCed. > > Which package are we talking about? > All. I offered to go through all ITAs, remove done ones, ask for status... > Since this will take me some hours, I asked on debian-qa first > if someone is doing this already. And tbm forwarded th

Re: Cleaning up ITA

2003-09-18 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 04:10:32PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > You wrote: > > > * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-18 15:55]: > > > I intend to clean up the ITA list a bit since the last attemp to do this > > > seems to have been in December 2002 (as far as I can see from reading >

Re: Cleaning up ITA

2003-09-18 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Martin! You wrote: > * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-18 15:55]: > > I intend to clean up the ITA list a bit since the last attemp to do this > > seems to have been in December 2002 (as far as I can see from reading > > That long ago? Hmm. > > > If anyone is working on this

Re: Cleaning up ITA

2003-09-18 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-18 15:55]: > I intend to clean up the ITA list a bit since the last attemp to do this > seems to have been in December 2002 (as far as I can see from reading That long ago? Hmm. > If anyone is working on this already or has other reasons to warn m

Cleaning up ITA

2003-09-18 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Hi. I intend to clean up the ITA list a bit since the last attemp to do this seems to have been in December 2002 (as far as I can see from reading the bug reports). If anyone is working on this already or has other reasons to warn me about doubled work, please stand up :) Gruesse, -- Frank Lich

Bug#211461: marked as done (packages.debian.org misses some news items)

2003-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:15:54 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#211461: packages.debian.org misses some news items has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the