Your message dated Thu, 18 Sep 2003 18:27:33 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Close this
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Sep 2003 16:55:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 16 11:55:45 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from moutvdom.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.250] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 19zJ79-0000j7-00; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 11:55:43 -0500
Received: from [212.227.126.220] (helo=mrvdomng.kundenserver.de)
        by moutvdom.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
        id 19zJ79-0004Ju-00
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 18:55:43 +0200
Received: from [80.146.44.138] (helo=frodo)
        by mrvdomng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
        id 19zJ78-0002S6-00
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 18:55:43 +0200
Received: by frodo (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 8DAB96265B; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 18:54:42 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 18:54:42 +0200
From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: developer.php: please supply repeatmerged=no
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uJWb33pM2TcUAXIl"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.28
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
X-GnuPG-Key: $ finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_IN_NJABL,RCVD_IN_ORBS
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


--uJWb33pM2TcUAXIl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: qa.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-16
Severity: wishlist

Hi, me again :)

http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=3Drene; openoffice.org has
dozens of merged bugs. I occassionally go over all bugs and do a mass
severity-changing, reassigning, tagging etc.

So what the current links show is repeatmerged=3Dyes which is not ideal
because I have more bugs than actually there I have to look at.
What about doing the following:?

developer.php shows the bug count as 1(2) when there are two bugs
merged to one. What about linking the 1 to repeatmerged=3Dno and 2 to
repeatmerged=3Dyes? The same with the colum "All" where currently is
no repeatmerged specified anyhow so it is yes.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux frodo 2.4.21-rene #3 Mit Aug 6 17:21:44 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Gr=FC=DFe/Regards,

Ren=E9
--=20
 .''`.  Ren=E9 Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
     =20

--uJWb33pM2TcUAXIl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/Z0BR+FmQsCSK63MRAjYWAJwLKCBFTKbApkJy9p8Q95mwi0IwVgCeP9/X
p7uFyPvcRUkm2oxZN+Ow1/s=
=FYdq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--uJWb33pM2TcUAXIl--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 211228-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2003 16:27:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 18 11:27:34 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from atoulouse-201-2-1-120.w193-251.abo.wanadoo.fr (tass.genibel.org) 
[193.251.11.120] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1A01d0-000119-00; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 11:27:34 -0500
Received: from igor by tass.genibel.org with local (Exim 4.22)
        id 1A01cz-0004UO-AE
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 18:27:33 +0200
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 18:27:33 +0200
From: Igor Genibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Close this
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-URL: http:/www.genibel.org/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0
        tests=none
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

The functionality is now available

Thanks.
-- 
Igor Genibel 
http://www.answare.fr/                             [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.tuxfamily.org/                            [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://people.debian.org/~igenibel                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92  9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F

Reply via email to