Re: Orphaning my packages

2003-07-15 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is fltk still needed (since fltk1.1 is newer)? A few things still depend on it, though they really ought to be rebuilt against 1.1, if only to make the g++ transition. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL

Re: Bug#193549: What to do with this !?

2003-07-15 Thread Charles Briscoe-Smith
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 12:07:43PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Since you say yourself that you're not particularly active anymore, I > assume you don't mind if I orhpan your packages? Okay, let's see... According to the web site, my packages are: bock, frotz, int-fiction, propsel, rocks-n-di

Re: Bug#193549: What to do with this !?

2003-07-15 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Charles Briscoe-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-15 12:51]: > I guess they should all be orphaned really - yes. I'd been holding > off because some, like bock in particular, I didn't want to let go... > Silly really. > Yes, please orphan them all. Thanks. OK, done. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAI

Re: Bug#193549: What to do with this !?

2003-07-15 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Charles Briscoe-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-05-29 22:53]: > Since bock seems to be causing problems, and it's been a while since I've > simultaneously had both the time and the inclination to do any Debian > work, and that situation seems to be one that may continue indefinitely, > especially

Re: Package, which does not go into testing for a long time

2003-07-15 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Artur R. Czechowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-14 00:09]: > Yes, of course. I've done some small research and some packages really looks > like orphaned (i.e. top two: vje-deltad pips). So I think that this is Yeah, those are orphaned now. If you have other packages/maintainers which look bad

Re: some maintainers that look MIA.

2003-07-15 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-15 11:48]: > * Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-05-23 15:39]: > > > Peter Moulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Not a developer? > I will contact him, Email bounces, package orphaned. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: some maintainers that look MIA.

2003-07-15 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-05-23 15:39]: > > Peter Moulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Not a developer? I will contact him, > > Michael-John Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Yasuhiro Take <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Anselm Lingnau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > All in the MIA database already. mj repli

Re: some maintainers that look MIA.

2003-07-15 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-05-24 08:47]: > > Yasuhiro Take <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Before 2002, he was a student of medical science, then he became a > resident. I think he couln't do any Debian works. > The state will continue at least a year. I orhpaned his stuff. -- Marti

Re: Orphaning my packages

2003-07-15 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Stefan Schwandter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-05-22 16:58]: > I have some packages left I'd like to orphan: > fltk, fltk1.1: The Fast Light Toolkit (www.fltk.org). A C++ GUI toolkit. > spiralsynthmodular (http://www.pawfal.org/Software/SSM/) : a modular > software synth. Needs fltk. > aseqview: d

Re: Removing libsdl-mm0.1?

2003-07-15 Thread Martin Michlmayr
reassign 192683 ftp.debian.org retitle 192683 Please remove libsdl-mm0.1 thanks seems ok. * Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-06-12 13:15]: > Hello, > Shouldn't libsdl-mm0.1 be simply removed from the distribution? No > other packages depend on it, it has an RC-bug (C++ transition), and >