Re: Mico, orphaned or adopted?

2002-10-22 Thread Stephen Crowley
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 07:21:38PM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote: > > [snip] > > If the package is still up for adoption, I will adopt it. > If Lenart Janos really did adopt it, then great. > However, why is there no reply to the O: in the wnpp bug? > > I am suspecting that the spam at the bot

Mico, orphaned or adopted?

2002-10-22 Thread Wesley W. Terpstra
Hi. Sorry for the long To: list, but I am not sure who knows what is going on. Where I am working we are using mico. However, the version in debian/unstable is a bit dated, and as my coworkers want "the latest and greatest", I should probably "fix it". ;-) I am puzzled by mico's status; is it

Bug#165821: marked as done (qa.debian.org: PTS has wrong information about source packages)

2002-10-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:59:19 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#165821: qa.debian.org: PTS has wrong information about source packages has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

We help you to realize the dream of travelling in China

2002-10-22 Thread holidaycn2002
charset="ISO-8859-1"; charset="ISO-8859-1"; charset="ISO-8859-1"; charset="ISO-8859-1"; charset="ISO-8859-1"; charset="ISO-8859-1"; charset="ISO-8859-1"; charset="ISO-8859-1"; charset="ISO-8859-1"; charset="ISO-8859-1"; charset="ISO-885