On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 07:21:38PM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote: > > [snip] > > If the package is still up for adoption, I will adopt it. > If Lenart Janos really did adopt it, then great. > However, why is there no reply to the O: in the wnpp bug? > > I am suspecting that the spam at the bottom broke the bug. > > Finally, what are the specifics about "the library naming issue that > upstream refuses to fix"? A versioning issue? Bad soname? Bad symlinks?
I'm not sure about the orphan issue.. I thought I had orphaned it a while ago. Their library naming is fairly broken, they use libmico2.3.3.so, instead of using sonames properly. It should be something like libmico.2.3.0.so and then the compiler can link with libmico.so, as it is now, when you link you have to specify the entier version, and even minor revisions of libmico require a relink. Hope this helps, -- Stephen
