Some people might find this useful:
http://bugs.debian.org/~cjwatson/severity.cgi
(add "?severity=critical", "?severity=grave", or "?severity=serious")
I find it handy when deciding what to work on, as (a) there's a
different mindset involved when fixing critical/grave bugs than when
fixing se
Hi,
I just ran strace on maildrop and it doesn't seem to include any kind of
fcntl*(*, F_SETLKW, *) call on the potato+sid machine. It seems I can
reproduce the bug on my sid machine too now, but it _does_ do the fcntl()
lock on it, yet mutt still bitches.
Downgrading maildrop to 0.75-2 makes mut
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 09:00:27AM +0100, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 03:58:31PM -0800, Martin Quinson wrote:
> > I completely agree. I didn't meant that all the packages with epoch should
> > check for it. I more wanted to get rid of the cruft in the packages do
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 03:58:31PM -0800, Martin Quinson wrote:
> I completely agree. I didn't meant that all the packages with epoch should
> check for it. I more wanted to get rid of the cruft in the packages doing
> the test. Why ? Well, for no real reason, in fact.
Well, only a thought, but th
ì ë³´íµì ë¶ ê¶ê³ ì¬íì ìê±° ì 목ì
[ê´ê³ ]ë¼ê³ í기í ê´ê³ ë©ì¼ì
ëë¤.ìì ì ìì¹ ìì¼ìë©´
ìì ê±°ë¶ë¥¼
ëë¬ì£¼ì¸ì
â
íëì¬ íí¬â
ìë
íì¸ì? ë°ë°ì
ëë¹^^
ì´ë²ì ì ê° ííì´ì§ë¥¼ ìë¡ ë§ë¤ìê±°ë ì.
íëì
5 matches
Mail list logo
