On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 03:58:31PM -0800, Martin Quinson wrote:
> I completely agree. I didn't meant that all the packages with epoch should
> check for it. I more wanted to get rid of the cruft in the packages doing
> the test. Why ? Well, for no real reason, in fact.
Well, only a thought, but the use of such a test in the preinst, could mean the
maintainer is not revisioning his/her package, so a sort of 'informative' mail
may be sent.
I'm quite new to the list, but shouldn't the qa group handle even these task?
With the least possible priority, though.
cheers,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have
Luca, a wannabe ``Good guy''. | something in common: they
| don't depend on the language.
