Bug#129966: xcoral: debian/rules contains an error in clean target due to missing build-dep

2002-01-27 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 02:57:53PM +0100, Othmar Pasteka wrote: > Package: xcoral > Version: 1:3.40-1 > Severity: serious > > hi, > > you have a test on yada, for some non-obvious reason please > enlighten me ... besides that, you should have a build-dep on > yada if you need it or whatever .. F

Re: wnpp-disposable

2002-01-27 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020128 00:29]: > I will make command line parameters available soon. 369:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: /org/qa.debian.org/data/wnpp] ./wnpp-disposable --help Usage: wnpp-disposable [ --days ] [ --verbose ] Show a listing of orphaned packages which are not in stable. Options:

wnpp-disposable

2002-01-27 Thread Martin Michlmayr
I've added wnpp-disposable to pandora:/org/qa.debian.org/data/wnpp. I intend to use this script soonish and have some packages removed. Here's the entry from the README. 2 variables can be set (see the source code); I will make command line parameters available soon. >From the README: wnpp-disp

Bug#58803: marked as done (asclock-gtk could use themes from gnome-panel-data)

2002-01-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:49:56 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Package asclock-gtk removed from Debian unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#102025: marked as done (non-existing url with asclock-gtk source code)

2002-01-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:49:56 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Package asclock-gtk removed from Debian unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Re: Adopting packages.

2002-01-27 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* David B Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020127 16:54]: > *cough* any volounteers? *cough* ;) Wrong list, try debian-mentors. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Adopting packages.

2002-01-27 Thread Martin Schulze
David B Harris wrote: > Hey ho :) I'm currently in the NM queue, waiting for my key to be > signed. It'll be a while, I believe, before I get it signed. It just > happens to be that I've moved to within a stone's throw of where my AM > works, though it's still across a border. :) > > Anyways, I wa

Re: Adopting packages.

2002-01-27 Thread David B Harris
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002 15:39:35 -0600 Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think people should view it as a long-term solution, but with > a good sponsor it's fine in the short term. It also helps with the > new-maintainer process, since you can demonstrate that you're > competent at hand

Re: Adopting packages.

2002-01-27 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 11:11:07AM -0500, David B Harris wrote: > Hey ho :) I'm currently in the NM queue, waiting for my key to be > signed. It'll be a while, I believe, before I get it signed. It just > happens to be that I've moved to within a stone's throw of where my AM > works, though it's st

Re: Adopting packages.

2002-01-27 Thread David B Harris
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002 18:02:20 + Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is what sponsorship is - it's become fairly normal. Really. Nuts. So it's normal? Still doesn't seem like a particularily good idea. -- .--=-=-=-=--=---=-=-=. /David Barcl

Re: Adopting packages.

2002-01-27 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 11:11:07AM -0500, David B Harris wrote: > Anyways, I was wondering what the QA group thinks about people > maintaining packages who arn't capable of uploading on their own. This is what sponsorship is - it's become fairly normal. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into

Adopting packages.

2002-01-27 Thread David B Harris
Hey ho :) I'm currently in the NM queue, waiting for my key to be signed. It'll be a while, I believe, before I get it signed. It just happens to be that I've moved to within a stone's throw of where my AM works, though it's still across a border. :) Anyways, I was wondering what the QA group thin

[±¤¡¡°í]ÆÒ½ºÄð-ÁøÂ¥ ÆÒÀ¸·Î »ìÀÚ!

2002-01-27 Thread ÆÒ½ºÄð
Title: ◆가짜 팬은 가랏! 진짜 팬, 가짜 팬을 구별해 주는 팬스쿨~◆ 정보통신부 권고 사항에 의거 제목에 [광고]라고 표기한 광고 메일입니다.수신을 원치 않으시면 수신거부를 눌러주세요 ◆가짜 팬은

gqmpeg maintainer field is broken

2002-01-27 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, Whoever uploaded version 0.11.0-2.1 of gqmpeg should fix the maintainer field and reupload ... (btw you don't need to use nmu style versioning for packages maintained by debian-qa) Maintainer: Debian QA Group ^^^ Architecture: i386 Version: 0.11.0-2.1 Tha

Re: Implementing my proposal for the organisation of QA

2002-01-27 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 11:27:37PM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva écrivait: > so... now I'm back to my home... I was working away from my city > and had limited time to Debian... I am willing to make efforts > on this cause, are you doing some? We can use debian-l10n-english > for proof-reading, btw

[±¤¡¡°í]SkyLife ¿¹¾à°¡ÀÔ °æÇ° ÓÞ ÀÜÄ¡

2002-01-27 Thread parkel
Title: 예약가입기간 정보통신부 권고 사항에 의거 제목에 [광고]라고 표기한 광고 메일입니다.수신을 원치 않으시면 수신거부를 눌러주세요   예약가입기간 2001.12.3 ~ 2002.2.28 이벤트 주체 SkyLife