Your message dated Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:49:56 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package asclock-gtk removed from Debian unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Feb 2000 14:55:44 +0000
Received: (qmail 18213 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2000 14:55:39 -0000
Received: from adminpg.inpg.fr (195.83.76.59)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2000 14:55:39 -0000
Received: from cepax6.lis.inpg.fr (IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [195.220.21.20])
        by adminpg.inpg.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA25594;
        Wed, 23 Feb 2000 15:55:33 +0100 (MET)
Received: from picpoul.lis.inpg.fr ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [195.220.21.151])
        by cepax6.lis.inpg.fr (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA08269;
        Wed, 23 Feb 2000 15:54:51 +0100
Received: from bonnaud by picpoul.lis.inpg.fr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
        id 12NdCP-00047s-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 15:55:33 +0100
From: laurent bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: asclock-gtk could use themes from gnome-panel-data
X-Reportbug-Version: 0.48
X-Mailer: reportbug 0.48
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 15:55:33 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: laurent bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Package: asclock-gtk
Version: 2.1.10-2
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

the differences between the themes from asclock-gtk and from gnome-panel-data
are very small.  Only old.clock.xpm would be missing (see below).  Could it be
possible not to duplicate themes in both packages ?  It would save more than
400KB on disk.


-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux picpoul 2.2.14 #1 SMP Mon Jan 10 12:40:16 CET 2000 i686

Versions of packages asclock-gtk depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.1.3-4    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libglib1.2                    1.2.7-1    The GLib library of C routines    
ii  libgtk1.2                     1.2.7-1    The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii  xlib6g                        3.3.6-3    shared libraries required by X cli


$ diff -r /usr/share/asclock-gtk/themes /usr/share/asclock
Only in /usr/share/asclock-gtk/themes/Freeamp: Makefile
Only in /usr/share/asclock-gtk/themes/Freeamp: Makefile.am
Only in /usr/share/asclock-gtk/themes/Freeamp: Makefile.in
Only in /usr/share/asclock-gtk/themes/Freeamp: old.clock.xpm
diff -r /usr/share/asclock-gtk/themes/Newstone/date.xpm 
/usr/share/asclock/Newstone/date.xpm
2c2
< static char *date_xpm[] = {
---
> static char *date[] = {
diff -r /usr/share/asclock-gtk/themes/Orb/date.xpm 
/usr/share/asclock/Orb/date.xpm
2c2
< static char *date_xpm[] = {
---
> static char *date[] = {
diff -r /usr/share/asclock-gtk/themes/Stone/date.xpm 
/usr/share/asclock/Stone/date.xpm
2c2
< static char *date_xpm[] = {
---
> static char *date[] = {
Only in /usr/share/asclock-gtk/themes: analog
Only in /usr/share/asclock-gtk/themes/beats: classic
diff -r /usr/share/asclock-gtk/themes/beats/date.xpm 
/usr/share/asclock/beats/date.xpm
2c2
< static char *date_xpm[] = {
---
> static char *date[] = {
Only in /usr/share/asclock-gtk/themes/classic: classic
diff -r /usr/share/asclock-gtk/themes/classic/date.xpm 
/usr/share/asclock/classic/date.xpm
2c2
< static char *date_xpm[] = {
---
> static char *date[] = {
Only in /usr/share/asclock-gtk/themes/shaped: classic
diff -r /usr/share/asclock-gtk/themes/shaped/date.xpm 
/usr/share/asclock/shaped/date.xpm
2c2
< static char *date_xpm[] = {
---
> static char *date[] = {

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 58803-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jan 2002 21:50:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 27 15:50:07 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gtso-c3477b5b.dsl.mediaways.net (mail.frosty-geek.net) 
[195.71.123.91] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 16UxBf-0006kj-00; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 15:50:07 -0600
Received: from nautilus.noreply.org (unknown [138.232.34.77])
        by mail.frosty-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id E908346C081; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:50:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: by nautilus.noreply.org (Postfix, from userid 10)
        id 8F4D8357C6; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:50:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: by fisch.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 53BC522BB2; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:49:56 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:49:56 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Package asclock-gtk removed from Debian unstable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The package asclock-gtk has been removed from Debian unstable and
won't be released as part of the next Debian release, woody (version
3.0).  I'm therefore closing all its open bugs.  A good replacement is
asclock.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me.

Best regards,

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to