* Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020101 13:30]:
> Can we prune it from the QA lists? It would make them a better tool,
> I think.
Well, sh is part of unstable (even if it's currently not keeping up).
Want you probably want is the listing for testing. You can choose
> What is sh?
The architecture: SuperH (binary-sh)
pgpgAE7SsnvFg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 01:24:01PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The Super-H (as found in Dreamcasts, for example).
> I'm afraid that doesn't answer my question.
It's a microprocessor.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydr
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020101 13:24]:
> > I'm afraid that doesn't answer my question.
>
> It's another architecture (like sparc or alpha) which has will however
> not be rel
* Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020101 13:24]:
> I'm afraid that doesn't answer my question.
It's another architecture (like sparc or alpha) which has will however
not be released with woody. They stopped uploading new packages a
while ago and thus package
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 01:15:59PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>
> > What is sh?
>
> The Super-H (as found in Dreamcasts, for example).
I'm afraid that doesn't answer my question.
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 01:15:59PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> What is sh?
The Super-H (as found in Dreamcasts, for example).
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
pgpfsbEGtHcCf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=xpuzzle
> ^
> There is an `s' missing.
>
> > I don't understand this. The package is in unstable, and uses the
> > current librari
> http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=xpuzzle
^
There is an `s' missing.
> I don't understand this. The package is in unstable, and uses the
> current libraries in unstable. Why does that make it broken?
I thin
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 12:44:45PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>
>
> Please take a gander at:
>
> http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=xpuzzle
Nothing at the end of this link;
"Distribution: unstable
Index not found. This probably means there are no packages in that
c
Please take a gander at:
http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=xpuzzle
I don't understand this. The package is in unstable, and uses the
current libraries in unstable. Why does that make it broken?
So Adrian Bunk seems to have done the last run-through of this, and
there are a number of packages for which the last mention was his "do
you really still want to adopt this?"--so, Adrian, what's the status?
I don't want to collide with your work.
Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm already working on a script that does exactly this (and more). I'ld
> welcome all help though.
Ok, well, I'll start on the current crop by hand, and then when the
script is ready, we can give it a whirl too.
> > However, two questions:
> > How ol
Hi Thomas!
You wrote:
> There are a number of very old ITAs on the wnpp list. Seems to me
> that we should contact the developers who posted the ITAs, and if they
> don't reconfirm, convert them to Os.
> I'm happy to do the work.
I'm already working on a script that does exactly this (and more)
Hi Thomas,
Try poking any ITA's which are more than six months ol and give them around 15
days to respond. Again thats just my
suggestion and views. That will really help other new developers like me to
maintain packages that are not being
maintained.
if u need my help let me know.
best rega
15 matches
Mail list logo
